Immigration ordinance — yes or no?


Maybe if the proposed Langley ordinance regarding immigration were limited to the two things the mayor has said repeatedly are already routine city practice — not asking about immigration status and not spending city funds enforcing federal immigration law — that would be an acceptable compromise to all concerned. Presumably that would be acceptable to the mayor, since if he thought current city practice was illegal he would have said so by now. Besides, we know such ordinances aren’t illegal because President Trump hasn’t threatened cities with such ordinances with legal action, which is what he would do if he thought the law was on his side. He’s threatened them with retaliation by withholding funds for unrelated projects, which is what you would do to punish someone if you didn’t like what they were doing but knew you couldn’t win in court.

So if the city is already doing those two things, why do we need an ordinance? Because someone at the city could decide tomorrow not to follow current practice and no one could say anything about it because it wasn’t an ordinance. Next week a police person could start asking everyone in town about their immigration status and reporting people to ICE [U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement]. There is nothing currently to stop a police person from doing that, which is why we need an ordinance.

I would just suggest that the ordinance not include the term sanctuary city or even inclusive city. Those terms are vague and come with a lot of baggage. Just call it something plain and descriptive like “Langley Ordinance Against Asking About Immigration Status and the Use of City Funds for Federal Immigration Enforcement.” Let’s keep it to something simple we already do and maybe that will work.



More in Letters to the Editor

Letter: Tell superintendent, school board to raise teacher pay

Editor, Through its McCleary decision, the Washington State Supreme Court concluded that… Continue reading

Letter: Whidbey Habitat for Humanity grateful for all its supporters

Editor, Thank you to our supporters. It has never been more important… Continue reading

Letter: What are Trump’s supporters thinking?

Editor, And speaking of MAGA hats in Langley and elsewhere, it is… Continue reading

Letter: ‘Liberal’ is not a dirty word, despite what Commissioner Hannold said

Editor, It is ironic and disturbing that Commissioner Hannold, in his quest… Continue reading

Letter: Hannold needs to stop dividing those he is representing

Editor, Rick Hannold. A public servant and commissioner. Went to a planning… Continue reading

Letter: Quick, professional EMTs save life after a blood clot emergency

Editor, I would like to thank the local EMTs who helped save… Continue reading

Letter: Commentary on MSNBC’s Morning Joe hit nail on head

Editor, In response to commentary by Donny Deutsch and Mika Brzezinski on… Continue reading

Letter: License plates helping make Admiralty lighthouse a big draw

Editor, There are over 3,500 people cruising around our state with a… Continue reading

Letter: Vote yes to keep parks funded

Editor, On the Aug. 7 ballot South Whidbey voters are being asked… Continue reading

Most Read