It’s not about facts, but how to change


I have read with interest the debate between Dean Enell and Rick Hannold concerning anthropogenic — human caused — climate disruption. Neither believes the other’s “facts.” Neither is going to change their mind.

Let’s say we imagine climate disruption has nothing to do with human behavior. What might happen? Perhaps nothing and the consensus of peer reviewed scientific study is just plain wrong. Great. We dodged a bullet. But what if those scientists are right? Doing nothing will cost us dearly. We’d plan for resilience and a low carbon future — wind and solar power, well insulated houses, organic agriculture. What if the scientists were wrong and we did all that. We are no worse off and probably better.

So playing the odds is one way to consider this yes/no debate on whether we need to pay attention and make some wise choices.

Or compare the attitudes of climate deniers to people whose doctors say if you keep smoking you’ll go to an early grave. You can argue with science, do as you please and take the risk. Or you can change and give yourself better odds.

Back to climate disruption. Why would anyone bet against the scientific consensus and be remembered for doing nothing to help the county adapt? Maybe it’s political survival. Look at Jimmy Carter. He suggested a small behavior change and lost the next election. Maybe it’s not wanting to alienate friends or backers or some interest group. Maybe it’s fear of looking like a fool. Or maybe it’s just playing roulette and risking our future.

It’s no longer about dueling “facts.” It’s about making prudent changes in case changing human behavior could change humanity’s future. What changes? Bring on your best ideas for making Island County climate safe. Just in case it’s true.

Vicki Robin


More in Letters to the Editor

Letter: Golden Rule is what most Americans are living by

Editor, Norms, standards and behaviors. We have moved through another election cycle,… Continue reading

Letter: Writer should be ashamed of his ‘misleading letter’

Editor, Well, I hope no one ever hires Lee Rebman to analyze… Continue reading

Letter: We can do better —don’t drive under the influence

Editor, Once again, Island Thrift has fulfilled the Impaired Driving Impact Panel… Continue reading

Letter: Trump is thuggish buffoon who would be laughed at

Editor, So, we’ve come to this. A president who praises Congressman Gianforte… Continue reading

Letter: Let your representative know the changes wanted

Editor, We all know that government is slow, at least when it… Continue reading

Letter: Electromagnetic fields are all around us, affect health

Editor, In normal Whidbey life, the typical exposure of a child or… Continue reading

Letter: Letter writer was incorrect about Initiative 1631 info

Editor, Norman Bodine’s anti-Initiative 1631 letter of Oct. 9 states, “95 percent… Continue reading

Letter: Can U C Me Campaign for safety awareness

Editor, This time of year, it’s dark when I leave my house… Continue reading

Letter: Oncology team appreciates patience of its patients

Editor, Fourteen months later, WhidbeyHealth has completed the new pharmacy that meets… Continue reading

Most Read