Langley should keep its promise to artists


This is letter is in response to The Record’s Aug. 12 editorial, “Insuring privately owned art is the responsibility of artists, not taxpayers.” For people making up their minds about this issue, I’d like to provide some information not reflected in your editorial.

I just became a member of the Langley Arts Commission, but this letter reflects my personal opinion. I was not an arts commission member when the Langley outdoor sculpture program began. So I’ve brought myself up-to-speed by reviewing the original requests for proposals (RFPs) issued by the city and I’ve looked into art loan programs in other cities.

Artists were promised insurance:

The original RFP says “Works of art will be insured by the City of Langley for the 18-month duration of the exhibit.”

City takes a percentage of sales:

The editorial states that if artists are selling their works, then “they’re in business and it’s not the job of taxpayers to pay their bills.” But this argument ignores the fact that Langley is a partner in this “business” because the city receives a 20 percent commission when works on display are sold.

Protect Langley’s legacy:

When I think about whether the city should provide insurance for artworks on public display, the question I ask myself is “What is the desired outcome?” I believe the desired outcome is first, for Langley to keep its word, and second, for Langley to protect its legacy and reputation as a community that cares about and supports art and artists.

Langley’s legacy dates back at least to 1917 when the artist colony Brackenwood was established by Margaret and Peter Camfferman. Art is in the bones of Langley. And all area residents and businesses benefit from the city’s sterling reputation for supporting and nurturing artists and displaying their works. Healthy businesses produce tax dollars and tax dollars support the infrastructure and public and cultural programs we all need and enjoy.

I believe Langley made a promise to artists when it commissioned their works and I’m hoping the wise and able leaders of the city find a way to keep that promise.




More in Letters to the Editor

Letter: Whidbey Habitat for Humanity grateful for all its supporters

Editor, Thank you to our supporters. It has never been more important… Continue reading

Letter: What are Trump’s supporters thinking?

Editor, And speaking of MAGA hats in Langley and elsewhere, it is… Continue reading

Letter: ‘Liberal’ is not a dirty word, despite what Commissioner Hannold said

Editor, It is ironic and disturbing that Commissioner Hannold, in his quest… Continue reading

Letter: Hannold needs to stop dividing those he is representing

Editor, Rick Hannold. A public servant and commissioner. Went to a planning… Continue reading

Letter: Quick, professional EMTs save life after a blood clot emergency

Editor, I would like to thank the local EMTs who helped save… Continue reading

Letter: Commentary on MSNBC’s Morning Joe hit nail on head

Editor, In response to commentary by Donny Deutsch and Mika Brzezinski on… Continue reading

Letter: License plates helping make Admiralty lighthouse a big draw

Editor, There are over 3,500 people cruising around our state with a… Continue reading

Letter: Vote yes to keep parks funded

Editor, On the Aug. 7 ballot South Whidbey voters are being asked… Continue reading

Letter: President Trump has plenty in common with ‘Tricky Dick’ Nixon

Editor, Who were Tricky Dick and Don, the Lying Con? This will… Continue reading

Letter: The county needs stricter rules on fire prevention to prevent danger

Editor, I am concerned about the fire hazard on South Whidbey. Did… Continue reading

Letter: Vote for Rita Latsinova for seat on state’s Court of Appeals

Editor, There is one outstanding candidate running for the Court of Appeals.… Continue reading

Letter: Vote for candidate Dave Paul for state House is a vote for integrity

Editor, Are you feeling we need some political relief — some integrity… Continue reading