Langley’s sanctuary city proposal is an opportunity

Editor,

Have you ever met a refugee? Have you ever met or worked with one, maybe you hired a refugee at some point and had the opportunity to talk with them a bit? Out of all the refugees you know, how many of them have taken a job from you? How many have made a city go bankrupt? The threat immigrants and refugees pose is made up. It’s fiction.

Last question here: How many people know of a town, city, county or state that’s declared itself to be a sanctuary and know of any repercussions that the federal government has imposed?

Right.

We can duck behind our ocean partitions, ignore the rest of world and remain safe. But not standing up is shameful. I’ve needed people to stand up for me throughout my life (thanks mom and dad). Because of where I live, the repercussions of someone not standing up for me were tolerable to non-existent. The repercussions for refugees and immigrants are real, and tangible. What if Bob Ferguson — the attorney who reversed the immigration ban — hadn’t stood up? What if the judge remained seated?

To the people in power: You were elected to make the best decisions. If you’re not supporting and arguing for becoming a sanctuary city, shame on you. You are abdicating, and in that vacuum fear and rhetoric can grow.

Words Matter. Words make a difference. It wasn’t the word cooperation, or welcoming, or community that the federal government threatened. It was sanctuary. Even though there’s no working definition of what a sanctuary city is, the idea was so scary that they threatened us if we dared use it. The realities of refugees and immigrants are different than the rhetoric, and the idea of repercussions is based in fear, not facts.

We have an opportunity. We can make our decision based on intimidation, rhetoric and fear. We can hide from what we know is true and real. Or, we can stand with a word — stand with people — that we would all embrace under any other circumstances. We have an opportunity to declare this place for what it is: a place of abundance, an Eden, a sanctuary. If you’re not standing with them, if you’re taking for granted and exploiting the resources and advantages Whidbey, if you’re not advocating for them by supporting this place as a sanctuary, shame on you. Shame on us all.

ANDREW NEFF

Clinton

More in Letters to the Editor

Letter: America does not come first for president

Editor, For Trump to stand next to Putin and think Putin’s suggestion… Continue reading

Letter: Proposed sewage system a bad idea

Editor, I read the article that appeared in the South Whidbey Record… Continue reading

Letter: Trump’s remarks were treasonous

Editor, I was completely stunned and horrified by Donald Trump’s remarks after… Continue reading

Letter: Prepare for the smokescreen on Initiative 1631, fossil fuels

Editor, Initiative 1631 places a fee on sources of carbon dioxide (fossil… Continue reading

Letter: Tom Seguine a good candidate for Washington Appeals Court

Editor, I recently met Tom Seguine and had an in-depth conversation with… Continue reading

Letter: It is worth taking time to read the U.S. Constitution, articles

Editor, It’s getting hard to ignore our national news and the extensively… Continue reading

Letter: Sheriff candidate’s campaign signs violate flag etiquette

Editor, I am disgusted every time I drive past a Lane Campbell… Continue reading

Letter: The Coupeville School board needs greater transparency

Editor, Coupeville School District has an opportunity to set a new standard… Continue reading

The South Whidbey Yacht Club has a wide range of offerings

Editor, First of all, many thanks to reporter Patricia Guthrie for her… Continue reading

Most Read