Letter: Consider the negative effects of the Growler expansion proposal

Editor,

The Navy’s intention to increase Growler pilot training four-fold in Central Whidbey raises many red flags. Whatever your politics, whatever your relationship with our armed forces, please consider:

1. It’s against military policy to station all crucial defense assets on one base, yet they are sending the entire Growler fleet to Whidbey. We become a bull’s eye for any enemy crazy enough to attack our country. Even if the military has another fleet of Growlers hidden elsewhere, we are still a prime target.

2. Coupeville area is our bread basket. Farmers cannot be in the fields during flights. Can we afford to lose our farmers? Also, jets do not burn clean. Usually the toxic by-products disperse in the atmosphere but Growlers fly low. What toxic particulates are falling on our farmland?

3. With 80,000 flights per year, we will have to establish an APZ – accident potential zone. Big name for the fact that these jets do crash, so our homes and our lives are at four times the risk. We will be asked to change zoning to prevent development in the APZ. People will be encouraged to leave their homes. Property values will plummet, meaning property taxes will fall, putting the burden on the rest of Island County residents to support local services.

4. The potential for crashes increases the potential for use of toxic fire fighting foam. While industries and local fire stations are required by law to eliminate these, the Navy is exempt and still has a stockpile. New studies reveal safe levels of these toxins is a tenth of the current EPA standard. Coupeville water is already above the new limits.

5. The tonnage of CO2 pollution from a four fold increase in Coupeville flights plus flights from Ault Field puts the Navy among the top 10 CO2 polluters in our green-leaning state.

Growlers can train elsewhere, but there’s no other Whidbey Island.

Vicki Robin

Langley

More in Letters to the Editor

Letter: Sheriff’s Citizens Patrol kept an eye on residence

Editor, Thank you, to the Island County Sheriff’s Citizens Patrol for watching… Continue reading

Letter: Paper’s editorial about FOI states what needed said

Editor, Thanks so much for putting in print what needed to be… Continue reading

Letter: Navy should reconsider increased use of OLF

Editor, I fear for the safety of my family. I am a… Continue reading

Letter: Navy should reconsider increased use of OLF

Editor, I’d like to thank our legislature, and our House Representative Dave… Continue reading

Letter: Pride picnic held on South Whidbey a family affair

Editor, On the Island Life page of the July 13 edition of… Continue reading

Letter: Ask leaders to support bill for early-onset Alzheimer’s

Editor, There’s a bill coming up in Congress to assist the 200,000… Continue reading

Letter: It’s easy for an outsider to criticize Growler victims

Editor, I just had to respond to the letter in the South… Continue reading

Letter: What is climate change? The weather is changing

Editor, A response Mr. Gunther’s editorial question of June 26. I have… Continue reading

Letter: Sign stealers are not accomplishing anything

Editor, It has come to my attention that small fractions of Americans… Continue reading

Most Read