Letter: Navy should be proactive, transparent on water

The Navy says it’s going to be a year before it installs a special filter to remove the PFAS chemicals contaminating Coupeville’s water. And that filter has not been designed and will not remove all of the PFASs.

Once filtered, Coupeville’s water will be monitored to make sure the filter is working, and to see how much of which PFASs people will still be drinking. Regardless of how small those amounts, people have a “right-to-know” what they are. The proper analysis of water after filtration will tell us. However, if detection and reporting limits are set too high, lower amounts of PFASs won’t be detected.

Coupeville and the Navy refuse to identify the detection limits to be used. The Navy wants the simple question to go through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) process, and for the questioner to agree to pay costs. Coupeville’s mayor won’t answer the question, saying only that EPA Method 537 will be used – which has been used with differing detection limits.

Why keep monitoring details a secret? And why reinvent the wheel and “design” a PFAS filter when they are on the market and in operation around the country? Could it be that a not-so-efficient filter system is in the works? A bargain-basement filter and loose monitoring would save the Navy money and allow unfiltered PFASs to go unreported.

Knowing what’s in our water is a right that the Navy and Coupeville officials have not always recognized. Coupeville was finding PFHXS in its water a year before water users were informed. The Navy knew the chemical had leaked from the Outlying Field (OLF) but didn’t test for it when nearby private wells were first investigated. PFHXS has been linked to child development problems and stays in the body longer than other PFASs.

The contamination of Coupeville’s water and private wells was discovered almost a year and a half ago. Even if things go as planned, people drinking Coupeville’s water will have waited two and a half years for it to be filtered. Meanwhile, they will have been drinking levels of PFASs that exceed the health advisories of a number of states.

The Navy has been neither transparent nor proactive. Nor has it addressed the PFAS contamination problem with the sense of urgency it deserves. Simple questions, like the one about detection limits, should be answered without citizens having to make FOIA or Public Records Act requests.

Rick Abraham

Greenbank WA

More in Letters to the Editor

Letter: Thank you, Robert Bishop, county coroner

Editor, I’d like to take a moment to thank our Island County… Continue reading

Letter: Opinion page cartoons are biased against Trump

Editor, I have been a customer of the South Whidbey Record for… Continue reading

Letter: Forget the wall, get Trump to testify while under oath

Editor, When will Donald Trump be forced to testify under oath? Bill… Continue reading

Letter: Forever grateful to Planned Parenthood for what it does

Editor, The coming 46th year anniversary of Roe vs. Wade is certainly… Continue reading

Letter: Choose the life of a child over getting an abortion

Editor, This Jan. 22 marks the 46th anniversary of Roe vs. Wade.… Continue reading

Editorial: Discussing animal shelter policies can be healthy, productive

Stories in the South Whidbey Record about dogs and cats are always… Continue reading

Letter: COER shouldn’t be able to hijack Section 106 process

Editor, Citizens of Ebey’s Reserve, or COER, has hijacked the Section 106… Continue reading

Letter: League of Women Voters, AAUW legislative brunch open to public

Editor, Much has been said about the renewed interest in government in… Continue reading

Letter: Letter writer was spot-on about Growler concerns

Editor, Kudos for Dave Anderson’s strong review of the many arguments for… Continue reading

Most Read