Letter: Peer review is crucial to climate change answers

Editor,

Regarding, “There are plenty of answers for climate change question” from June 28, I’d like to add a few more sources for solid, science-based climate change information.

For beginners, probably the best website is “What We Know” from the American Association for the Advancement of Science, which publishes one of the world’s most highly cited, peer-reviewed science journals, “Science” and Scientific American. NASA/NOAA, National Geographic and Smithsonian feature good climate science articles online. Peer-reviewed data is the key.

Another good site for those confused by all the climate denial fabricated by the fossil fuel industry’s clandestinely funded $2 billion climate denial propaganda machine is skepticalsciemce.org. It’s an interactive site run by volunteer climate scientists where you can get all your questions answered by the real experts in a way you can understand.

The fossil fuel industry’s business model depends on climate denial. They have trillions at stake, so they’re spending billions on climate denial (Scientific American). Big Tobacco did the same thing back in the day, hiring fake “doctors” to deny that smoking causes lung cancer.

Now this nation’s biggest oil and coal corporations’ deniers-for-hire are “scientists.” There isn’t a professional climate denier who isn’t paid under the table by fossil fuel corporations (ucsusa.org “Climate Deception Dossiers”).

Fronts like The Heartland Institute are at the heart of this cynical operation. Heartland actually used to launder the money for the tobacco corporations, now they do it for fossil fuel corporations, funneling the money from them to their fake climate “experts” (Merchants of Doubt, desmogblog.org).

Lynn Goldfarb

Denver

More in Letters to the Editor

Letter: Climate crisis doesn’t need to cause a catastrophe

Editor, Let’s jump forward to 2040 and see what’s new with our… Continue reading

Letter: Linda Racicot provides leadership on school board

Editor, I support Linda Racicot for School Board because for over eight… Continue reading

Consider the facts and vote for water infrastructure bond

Editor, I am responding to the letter from Mr. Moses of Edgecliff… Continue reading

Letter: Groundwater management is a much needed component

Editor, The Langley Infrastructure Program handout of May 28 states that the… Continue reading

Letter: Cyr is ‘smart, personable, progressive,’ right for job

Editor, I join the chorus of voices urging citizens to elect Craig… Continue reading

Letter: Don’t buy into ‘myths’ about septic pollution

Editor, In response to Tim Callison’s letter to the editor in the… Continue reading

Letter: Navy naysayers may not like the consequences

Editor, To the misguided citizens trying so very hard to force the… Continue reading

Letter: Reject the water system bond, focus on repairs

Editor, The city wants more money for a “Water Management System Improvement… Continue reading

Letter: In search of rank-and-file supporters with integrity

Editor, I write today to decry all Republicans, and others, who still… Continue reading

Most Read