Letter: Say ‘yes’ to infrastructure bond, it will benefit all

Editor,

On the Nov. 5 ballot, Langley voters will be asked to decide on a $4-million Langley water system bond added to property taxes. This bond will pay for a bit more than half of an infrastructure plan totaling $7 million, which was developed by Langley utility management staff and city council members.

The other $3 million will come from an Island County Rural Counties Development grant. The county stipulated that the grant is conditional on Langley voting favorably on the bond.

Langley’s utilities have deteriorated considerably over recent decades. We still have 60-year-old asbestos/cement water mains. Numerous aging sewer pipes leak inwards so our plant treats ground and storm water as well as sewage. We, the community of Langley, can choose to be pro-active or reactive.

The cost of being pro-active implements a relatively small property tax increase, improves water quality and reliability, and stabilizes water utility rates. If we choose to be reactive, then we will be forced to pay steep rates and take out emergency loans as the aging system continues to deteriorate and fail unexpectedly, affecting water, sewer and storm drain systems.

By integrating projects, contractors will minimize roadway interruptions and save about 30 percent. The infrastructure plan also finally adds sewer service hookup options to East Langley decades after residents paid their share for the sewer treatment plant. These upgrades will provide Langley with a solid, reliable infrastructure base for the future and add a pedestrian walkway to sixth street.

Langley won’t soon have another opportunity to catch up on utility system deficits with close to half the cost coming from a grant. I and my fellow members of the “YES” Committee on Langley water bonds urge you to consider an affirmative vote. We need 60 percent of citizens voting, so please do vote, and vote “yes.” The Village by the Sea needs you.

Jim Dobberfuhl, Chair, YES Committee, Langley Water Bonds

Langley

More in Letters to the Editor

Letter: Lack of Christian values is the problem, not guns

Editor, We had another shooting and all the anti-gun, anti-Second Amendment people… Continue reading

Letter: Newspaper’s pie poll showed pastry bias

Editor, I could not help but notice in your poll, “What is… Continue reading

Letter: Consequences of gun violence far reaching

Editor, As I sit typing this letter, the news media are reporting… Continue reading

Letter: Carbon fee best option to curb climate change

Editor, A recent letter questioned carbon/divident fee legislation to reduce greenhouse gases,… Continue reading

Letter: Presentation slated to explain tax assessment

Editor, The Island County Assessor’s Office has been invited by the Whidbey… Continue reading

Letter: Monster Mash made more memorable by community

Editor, Whidbey Children’s Theatre (WCT), along with the South Whidbey High School… Continue reading

Letter: Citizens should support house carbon fee bill

Editor, It was the Sunday after the global climate strike inspired by… Continue reading

Letter: Langley ordinance changes encourage affordable housing without sewer

Regarding the Infrastructure Bond proposed for Langley, I am writing to inform… Continue reading

Letter: Congress should ban PFAS in firefighting foam

Editor, Recently I attended an informative meeting hosted by the local greening… Continue reading

Letter: Water infrastructure bond is well thought out

A recent letter to The Record from the head of the “con”… Continue reading

Letter: Water issues need to be addressed in East Langley

Editor, I have been reading the different pros and cons regarding Langley’s… Continue reading

Letter: Willeford is committed to equity in school district

Editor, We are engaged residents of South Whidbey and represent an array… Continue reading