Letter: Should be no bus fares

Editor,

I’ve been an Island County resident for 28 years, and I am a transit rider.

As I understand it, the fare proposal would decrease ridership by 30-40 percent in IT’s own projections, increasing traffic, ferry line waits and pollution; cut service the most for people who can least afford it and people who are least able in their daily lives to navigate complex functions, download apps or carry exact change (they will stop riding as regularly as they do now); and increase wait times at certain stops as people navigate fare collection, decreasing reliability of the schedule, causing more to abandon the system.

All these are contrary to public interest. So there must be a compelling financial case for doing this. But here are the figures from Island Transit’s material:The projection is that, after five years, fares will net around $210,000, and the budget will be about $14 million. $210,000 is 1 and 1/2 percent of $14 million.

So after all these negative effects, contrary to public interest and, I would say, IT’s own mission, the gain is 1 amd 1/2 percent. That is not a compelling financial argument.

Regarding their social equity mitigation plan, which is to provide one-day passes to nonprofits and government to dole out to those who meet eligibility requirements, for the last 20 years I have been Social Services secretary for the Salvation Army in Washington State. We have a number of these arrangements with transit systems. It is a miserable plan. Instead of the dignity of riding the bus at the time and for the purpose of my choosing, if I am low income, I must apply, a humiliating process, prove I deserve it, which in some cases includes proving to a stranger that my ride is something “legitimate” like a doctor appointment or job interview, then I get a pass for one day. It’s horrible.

Someone will say, “But other transit systems do this.” We did not move to Island County because it is like other places. Fare-free transit is part of our character here.

That does not mean we don’t pay for it. We do. Through taxes, public income to serve the public interest. And we all benefit from it, not just the riders. This proposal, however, keeps all of our taxes and diminishes the product greatly. We get a less efficient, less productive system. That is not a good deal for all of us currently paying for this.

In five years, if IT implements fares, they will still have to raise 98.5 percent of their budget from other sources. I say: Make it 100 percent. Refuse to accept all these negative impacts. Tell the state lawmakers and DOT, who are there to serve the public, that in Island County, this public service will remain publicly funded, to the benefit of all.

Tom Walker

Clinton

More in Letters to the Editor

Letter: Newspaper’s pie poll showed pastry bias

Editor, I could not help but notice in your poll, “What is… Continue reading

Letter: Consequences of gun violence far reaching

Editor, As I sit typing this letter, the news media are reporting… Continue reading

Letter: Carbon fee best option to curb climate change

Editor, A recent letter questioned carbon/divident fee legislation to reduce greenhouse gases,… Continue reading

Letter: Presentation slated to explain tax assessment

Editor, The Island County Assessor’s Office has been invited by the Whidbey… Continue reading

Letter: Monster Mash made more memorable by community

Editor, Whidbey Children’s Theatre (WCT), along with the South Whidbey High School… Continue reading

Letter: Citizens should support house carbon fee bill

Editor, It was the Sunday after the global climate strike inspired by… Continue reading

Letter: Langley ordinance changes encourage affordable housing without sewer

Regarding the Infrastructure Bond proposed for Langley, I am writing to inform… Continue reading

Letter: Congress should ban PFAS in firefighting foam

Editor, Recently I attended an informative meeting hosted by the local greening… Continue reading

Letter: Water infrastructure bond is well thought out

A recent letter to The Record from the head of the “con”… Continue reading

Letter: Water issues need to be addressed in East Langley

Editor, I have been reading the different pros and cons regarding Langley’s… Continue reading

Letter: Willeford is committed to equity in school district

Editor, We are engaged residents of South Whidbey and represent an array… Continue reading

Letter: School board needs a new voice

There’s been a lot of talk about experience in this School Board… Continue reading