Republican led Senate is holding the state capital budget hostage

By KIM DRURY and TOM FOX

This is about protecting state water resources.

Last week, state representatives Norma Smith and Dave Hayes issued a statement defending the Republican Senate’s decision not to adopt a capital budget because the Democrats wouldn’t agree to the GOP’s version of a controversial water rights bill known as the Hirst fix. Now, without a capital budget, billions of dollars of critical state construction projects — many of them on Whidbey Island — are left hanging for the foreseeable future.

I take issue with much of what the statement said, and what it left out. But a couple of important points: the water rights “fix” that Republicans advocated was to revert to the way the state Department of Ecology administered water rights for exempt wells (for households) before the State Supreme Court intervened. The “fix” allows domestic wells to be drilled pretty much anywhere so long as fewer than 5,000 gallons a day are drawn. No water meters are required. No studies are required to determine whether the new well might interfere with streamflows or neighboring wells.

Five thousand gallons a day is the “limit,” a point the Republicans would not back down on. But how much does a family home actually need? My family’s summer water use is about 183 gallons a day. In the winter, it’s less than 100 gallons a day, which is about average.

It’s unfortunate that some counties with over-allocated water resources (not Island County) have stopped issuing building permits until the state resolves the issue, meaning that plans for building new homes in those areas are put on hold. But it’s irresponsible for the Republican Senate to hold the state capitol budget hostage by insisting on a “Hirst quick fix,” a fix that runs roughshod over treaty rights of some tribes and senior water right holders and winks at compliance with the Growth Management Act. Washington’s water laws are byzantine and involve a lot of seriously competing interests, i.e., it is not a situation that makes for an easy last-minute solution.

And perhaps most important, it is just plain wrong to insist that permits for 5,000-gallon-a-day wells without meters are OK. It is out of touch with the reality that fresh clean water is a limited and valuable natural resource, and not to be wasted.

Editor’s note: Kim Drury and Tom Fox are Langley residents.

More in Letters to the Editor

Letter: Navy, country need place for Growlers to practice

Editor, As a retired master chief who served at Whidbey Island, both… Continue reading

Letter: Our island community making a big difference

Editor, Thanks to Laura Guido for her article, “Making Art to Make… Continue reading

Letter: Insurance cuts a slap in the face

Editor, WhidbeyHealth recently announced budget cuts, as noted in the South Whidbey… Continue reading

Letter: Arrest by deputies’ helped avert potential tragedy

Editor, On Nov. 21, we on Whidbey Island were very likely in… Continue reading

Letter: Not anti-defense; against being ‘collateral damage’

Editor, I read the South Whidbey Record Dec. 5 article, “Navy ends… Continue reading

Letter: Frustrated by a lack of enforcement by county

Editor, It is in the spirit of continuous improvement that I write… Continue reading

Letter: Goal of matching large donation met at event

Editor, I would like to extend a personal thank you to all… Continue reading

Letter: Road etiquette and safety is important and serious

Editor, I complain about this all the time and I do my… Continue reading

Letter: WIN thankful for support community has shown

Editor, Whidbey Island Nourishes, or WIN, is celebrating the generosity of local… Continue reading

Most Read