Testy retort letter about Whidbey airfield was inaccurate

Editor,

I’m answering Pete Becker’s testy retort to me about Whidbey’s Growler problem. He had some serious misreadings and inaccuracies. Example: “OLF was built…[74 years ago] to efficiently and safely conduct carrier landing practice.” Reality: The field was made in WWII for small propeller-driven fighters to just land. After WWII was a period of dormancy. It was reactivated in the late 1960s to mimic an aircraft carrier for “flight carrier landing practice (FCLP).”

Its ancient surface is dangerously below standard for heavier fighters. Its length (5,280 feet) is 3,000 feet below standards, with civilian-inhabited “crash zones” at its ends, begging for a deadly incident. Just 700 clear acres around it is one-fortieth or 2.3 percent of the currently mandated 30,000 clear acres for any new FCLP field. But, Becker thinks “required level of performance” can only occur at this crowded, unsafe field. In fact, two years ago the Navy halted all FCLPs at OLF for 13 months and moved them to California/Nevada. Currently, it has halted all ops at OLF for a number of months (but doing them elsewhere) while water testing for its other deadly problem: extensive toxic pollutants from an OLF well site that have trashed civilian wells.

He also missed all my points on why the Navy isn’t the money pump for Whidbey he thinks it is. I can’t repeat all that here, except perhaps examples like how many Navy families take state food stamps, use Whidbey health programs, and use roads they don’t pay to upkeep. And if only, Mr. Becker, the Navy kept its “$5,000 for students of military” impact-aid agreement of 1950 (that would be $50,111 in today’s dollars per student!). But no, times change, so now the struggling Oak Harbor school district’s budget shows impact aid is now just $155 per student of military (and payments are always paid one year-plus late). And get this: it is now paid by the U.S. Department of Education, not the Navy, which pays zero.

Finally, Becker didn’t acknowledge my explanation of why it is a financial disaster for land-depreciated noise-hounded residents to “give away” a home and seek new expensive housing elsewhere. He just says “Move!” (After all, it’s simple in Clinton so must be simple there.)

MARK WAHL

Langley

More in Letters to the Editor

Need to lobby legislators to keep net neutrality

Editor, Ready to send more money to your Internet service provider (ISP)?… Continue reading

Enjoyed Island Transit’s birthday celebration

Editor, I want to thank Island Transit for sharing its birthday celebration… Continue reading

Americans must show Trump that he’s wrong

Editor, It was Maya Angelou who once told us, “When someone shows… Continue reading

Happy to be back and serving the community

Editor, To our island community and beyond: Thank you! Thank you! Thank… Continue reading

South Whidbey does in fact have a public pool

Editor, I take exception to your claim that South Whidbey has no… Continue reading

Inclusive city decision far from transparent

Editor, Quite opposite to The South Whidbey Record’s front page headline on… Continue reading

Thanks for helping make dream come to fruition

Editor, As many of you know, I am the bassist with the… Continue reading

Great items to be found at local church bazaars

Editor, Thanks so much to the churches that donate their love and… Continue reading

Don’t eliminate parking spots for wider sidewalks

Editor, Regarding the parking in Langley, I was quite surprised to read… Continue reading

Hold contractors and home services companies accountable

Editor, This is an open letter to the many local contractors and… Continue reading

Gun reform is needed in America

Editor, Anticipating a reaction to The Record’s Nov. 8 editorial advocating a… Continue reading

Thank Puget Sound Energy workers for their efforts

Editor, How many people lost power the other day? Has anyone thanked… Continue reading