Listen to your mind, heart when voting

Editor,

The 962 registered voters of Langley Precinct #166 face tough decisions in the pending elections for the three contested positions for city council.

Currently, we have a highly effective council in office. They are a diverse group representing a wide spectrum of age, gender, sexual preference and experience. They worked together through tumultuous discussions and have shown that they can work together to listen to and legislate according to the wishes of their constituents. Langley would be well served if these incumbents would remain in office.

I know all of the challengers. They are an excellent group of candidates, and I am pleased that they are willing to stand for election and to serve. I hope all the voters of Langley have similarly taken advantage of the opportunities to speak with each candidate.

I strongly believe whatever the outcome of the election, the citizens of Langley would benefit from being served by each of these candidates.

One theme that has emerged in the election rhetoric has been that of representation of adjacent residents (Greater Langley) in the City of Langley civic affairs and whether those who live in Greater Langley should have a larger voice.

Currently, there are seven taxing districts that have elected officials that overlap the city and directly represent Greater Langley’s interest. Further, there are seven citizen advisory committees in Langley government that allow for non-resident membership. So, to say that the interests of those adjacent residents are not listened to is incorrect.

Additionally, there has been a theme expressed of bringing a partisan platform of candidates to the council. Our elected positions are non-partisan by state code.

A town of Langley’s size does not have the resources to expend on partisan battles. If political affiliations enter our local legislative body, we could end up like the state, which is unable to pass its $4 Billion Capital Fund Budget due to a partisan dispute over the Hirst Decision.

I hope the citizens weigh their decisions carefully and listen to their mind as well as their hearts when selecting their candidate for city council.

TIM CALLISON

Langley mayor

More in Letters to the Editor

The South Whidbey Yacht Club has a wide range of offerings

Editor, First of all, many thanks to reporter Patricia Guthrie for her… Continue reading

Letter: Before you judge someone, walk a mile in his or her shoes

Editor, It has come to my attention that there has been lots… Continue reading

Letter: Don’t blame Trump for the immigration system problems

Editor, I am amazed that some folks believe we should just open… Continue reading

Letter: Do we expect too much from police?

By Rufus Rose How much do we expect of our police? Perhaps,… Continue reading

Letter: Whidbey Institute’s July 1 open house was a total success

Editor, These times are filled with bad news — social justice atrocities,… Continue reading

Letter: Offer compassion and housing for the homeless

Editor, In response to Ms. Duggan’s letter to the editor June 23,… Continue reading

Letter: President Donald Trump the real problem, not illegal immigrants

Editor, We do not have an illegal immigration problem in this country,… Continue reading

Letter: Island Transit made right decision on bus fares; ‘free’ will benefit all

Editor, When Island Transit’s board decided to continue a policy of no… Continue reading

Letter: Consider the negative effects of the Growler expansion proposal

Editor, The Navy’s intention to increase Growler pilot training four-fold in Central… Continue reading

Most Read