Who on the city council represents Langley residents?

Editor,

If Langley residents were asked to vote on having amplified rock music played in their neighborhoods on a monthly basis they would say, “No, of course not. Who in the world would?”

So, how did it happen that the Langley City Code was changed by a vote of three council members on June 19, 2017, to allow disturbing the peace of its neighborhoods? One would think city councils represented the wishes of its residents, yet, no one in Langley was asked. Not only did the council ignore previous and painful history on this issue, it acted without any depth of thinking at all.

A major challenge of relying on a mayor-council form of government that changes every few years is continuity of the culture. New members may not realize the historical precedents that are the basis of current city codes. Neighborhood organizations like LAND (Langley Association of Neighbors Downtown) can be essential for providing a common sense interface between the council, Langley residents and businesses.

LAND members presented concerns to the city council on Oct. 17, 2016, about the problems and dangers of having amplified music in neighborhoods. They referenced the previous five years of difficulties recorded by neighbors whose lives were disrupted by noise problems from the nearby business on Second Street, Mo’s Pub. A year ago LAND, hoping to prevent an avoidable disturbance from occurring again on Second Street, communicated directly to the council and the new business that’s advertising amplified music, The Machine Shop.

That code requires special permits and fees for allowing amplified music six times a year, along with many other conditions “to attenuate noise impact to adjacent residential properties.” LAND members asked the city council to stand by the Municipal Code as it is written. Code 18.22.095. And everyone agreed that it would be so.

On June 19, 2017, the city council voted to change the Municipal Code to allow 12 amplified music events annually. Why? More importantly, what can be done about a city council that does not represent the wishes of the people it is meant to serve?

Respectfully,

SUSAN SCOTT and BARBARA SMALL

Langley

More in Letters to the Editor

See if Langley joins carbon initiative Dec. 18

Editor, Let’s hear it for the City of Langley for they’ve consented… Continue reading

Need to lobby legislators to keep net neutrality

Editor, Ready to send more money to your Internet service provider (ISP)?… Continue reading

Enjoyed Island Transit’s birthday celebration

Editor, I want to thank Island Transit for sharing its birthday celebration… Continue reading

Americans must show Trump that he’s wrong

Editor, It was Maya Angelou who once told us, “When someone shows… Continue reading

Happy to be back and serving the community

Editor, To our island community and beyond: Thank you! Thank you! Thank… Continue reading

South Whidbey does in fact have a public pool

Editor, I take exception to your claim that South Whidbey has no… Continue reading

Inclusive city decision far from transparent

Editor, Quite opposite to The South Whidbey Record’s front page headline on… Continue reading

Students can learn from recent South Whidbey Record article

Editor, I’m writing in response to the South Whidbey Record article Saturday… Continue reading

Great items to be found at local church bazaars

Editor, Thanks so much to the churches that donate their love and… Continue reading

Don’t eliminate parking spots for wider sidewalks

Editor, Regarding the parking in Langley, I was quite surprised to read… Continue reading

Hold contractors and home services companies accountable

Editor, This is an open letter to the many local contractors and… Continue reading

Gun reform is needed in America

Editor, Anticipating a reaction to The Record’s Nov. 8 editorial advocating a… Continue reading