Opinion

EDITORIAL | Law and justice tax up to voters

The Island County Board Commissioners decided to follow a Law and Justice Council recommendation to put a $2.6-million law-and-justice measure on the ballot. It is now up to the voters to decide whether they want to further fund law and justice services.

It will be up to the Law and Justice Council — the group recommending the ballot measure — to make the case to voters.

Island County Sheriff Mark Brown and Prosecutor Greg Banks have done a great job of explaining the impacts that budget cuts had on their departments over the years.

Some have accused them of bellyaching, but each has put forth a compelling case. For example, the sheriff’s office is tied with Thurston County for being the lowest-staffed in the state on a per capita basis.

Brown isn’t able to provide two-deputy coverage, 24 hours a day in each of the three precincts.

That in itself, Brown said, is risky for deputies and citizens.

Few people, and none of the county commissioners, question that there is a need. The question is how to find the money. Brown, Banks and other law-and-justice officials have spelled out exactly how they would spend the $2.6 million in additional tax dollars.

Brown said he will hire 16 patrols deputies, three detectives and three corrections deputies over the course of a few years.

The specifics should satisfy Commissioner Helen Price Johnson, who said she is cautious about the ballot measure after the failure of Prop. 1.

The problem, she said, was that the county wasn’t clear about exactly how the money would have been spent.

“If you’re asking them to reach into their wallets, they need to know what services will be provided,” Price-Johnson said. We couldn’t agree more.

Hopefully the county is fine-tuning the measure and presenting a clear plan to voters.

The Law and Justice Council and law-and-justice officials need to continue to press their message and educate the public about the very real needs.

Based on the facts and circumstances, we trust voters to decide what costs they are willing to cover through higher taxes.

 

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

Read the Nov 26
Green Edition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Browse the archives.

Friends to Follow

View All Updates