EDITORIAL | Insuring privately owned art is the responsibility of artists, not taxpayers

  • Saturday, August 12, 2017 1:30am
  • Opinion

The Langley Arts Commission this week proposed the city council approve a measure to have taxpayers foot the bill for insuring temporary public art.

Perhaps we’re being philistines here, but picking up the tab for private artists who are already benefiting from displaying their works in prominent public locations is a form of government subsidization and therefore an inappropriate use of public funds. It would far better if the arts commission raised the funds itself to cover the cost.

The temporary public art program began a few years ago with the formation of the arts commission. Both were beneficial additions to Langley, a town that’s heavily supportive and increasingly defined by the arts.

The program works by allowing artists to display their works, free of charge, in locations around the city for a period of 18 months. If it sells, the city gets 20 percent of the proceeds. If it doesn’t, the commission puts out a call of new pieces.

Frank Rose, chairman of the arts commission, argues that artists can’t afford to buy insurance themselves and that picking up the tab isn’t a subsidy because public art enriches Langley and is a draw for visitors.

“The government gains, and the community gains from it,” he said.

We agree that the temporary art program is a great program and that Langley is better for it. But if artists are selling their work, then they’re in business and it’s not the job of taxpayers to pay their bills. Other cities may do so, but that doesn’t necessarily make it a good practice or mean there aren’t better ways to safeguard temporary public art works.

This issue came about suddenly and it’s not unreasonable for Langley to try and help with the cost of the project that brought the issue to light so it can make the scheduled Aug. 18 debut, but in the future the arts commission should be responsible for funding insurance for privately owned artwork. Given the community’s great love of the arts, we suspect it would have no trouble doing so.

More in Opinion

States must find gun regulation compromise

When he was a candidate for president, Donald Trump promised to do… Continue reading

Thankful to community for festival support

Editor, Island Shakespeare Festival presented its first indoor production in January at… Continue reading

Banning all guns isn’t the answer to mass shootings

Editor, In reply to Sharron Gray’s Feb. 3 letter to the editor,… Continue reading

Thank you for urging responsible climate change action

Editor, Thank you for your editorial urging responsible action in confronting climate… Continue reading

Irony in Navy, civillian responses to security

Editor, Naval Air Station Whidbey Island just concluded a two-week drill which… Continue reading

Roundabout isn’t safe solution to traffic

Editor, The Washington State Department of Transportation has not put traffic counters… Continue reading

Concerned with safety of island and country

Editor, I was concerned about the Feb. 7 article “Law will allow… Continue reading

Most Read