EDITORIAL | Looking forward to a new Dog House (corrected)

Barring any new or unforeseen obstacles, the Dog House in Langley will get its fabled building permit this week.

The document, which has been years in the making, will green light about $1.2 million in renovations, and ultimately pave the way for the reopening of this much loved and missed First Street icon. This is great news. The Dog House’s future has long been in question, and the permit’s issuance will be an important first step toward ensuring a new future for the more than 100-year-old building.

But it’s been a long road, and the trials associated with the project are an excellent example of the difficulties of modern-day development when it comes to structures of historical significance. They’re old, expensive to save, and further complicated by public sentiment and opinion. Planners and saviors/developers (depending how you look at them) often have to wrestle the sometimes fine line of preserving a piece of the past while remaining financially realistic. It’s a recipe for friction, and certainly one that’s boiled up with the Dog House renovation.

Building owners Charlie and Janice Klein and officials at city hall have been doing this waltz for several years and it appears the dance is nearing an end. While some might be quick to say that Langley, a town with a reputation for being not-so-business friendly, made the process too arduous, we’d argue that’s a bit unfair. As we mentioned above, these are challenging projects that require a lot of balancing.

One thing the city should reflect on, however, is the use of improvement or maintenance sureties. Per city code, they are essentially monetary deposits that city officials can require of developers to ensure a project is completed. If they’re not, for whatever reason, then the city uses the funds to finish things up.

No doubt there are special circumstances that warrant such steps, but they should be outlined in the code and not subjectively enforced. Also, it seems risky to apply them to projects that are already dancing on the knife of financial viability.

Overall, however, both the Kleiners and the city should be congratulated for powering through this tough process. We’re eager for the reopening of the Dog House, as is the rest of South Whidbey.

Editor’s note: A previous version of this story contained incorrect information about the past use of sureties. They have been used in the past.

More in Opinion

Cartoon for July 14, 2018

Cartoon for July 14, 2018… Continue reading

Be safe on the water this boating season

The recent boating tragedy in Crescent Harbor should serve as a reminder… Continue reading

Cartoon for July 11, 2018

Cartoon for July 11, 2018… Continue reading

Sound Off: Drug court is effective for some, but fails others

By Lane Campbell At a recent campaign forum on South Whidbey, I… Continue reading

Cartoon for Saturday, July 7, 2018

Cartoon for Saturday, July 7, 2018… Continue reading

Time to pick the Best of Whidbey ’18

What’s your favorite place to grab a beer? How about a burger?… Continue reading

Cartoon for Saturday, June 30

Cartoon for Saturday, June 30… Continue reading

The South Whidbey Yacht Club has a wide range of offerings

Editor, First of all, many thanks to reporter Patricia Guthrie for her… Continue reading

Letter: Before you judge someone, walk a mile in his or her shoes

Editor, It has come to my attention that there has been lots… Continue reading

Most Read