Letter: AG lawsuit questions EIS process, not Navy’s value

Editor,

State Rep. Norma Smith wrote: “I’m deeply disappointed in Attorney General Bob Ferguson’s misguided lawsuit and attack on our military community on Whidbey Island.”

And I am deeply disappointed in Rep. Smith for her mischaracterization of the situation.

Citizens who bear the brunt of the incessant jet noise are not hostile to Naval Air Station Whidbey Island or to the Navy or to the military or to national security.

They don’t advocate for closing the base.

They only beg that the Navy sends Growler pilots to train at an airfield in a less populated, less environmentally rich and less tourist — i.e. peace and quiet — dependent place.

NASWI was a vital military and community asset before the Growler training flights and will be after the training flights (not the fleet) go elsewhere.

She says, “The vast majority of Whidbey Islanders cherish our service members, and honor their service and sacrifice.”

People who suffer health and learning effects of incessant jet noise cherish our service members and honor their service and sacrifice.

Absolutely.

Implying otherwise suggests that citizens who ask for redress are unpatriotic. This is not an assumption any lawmaker wants to promote.

Citizens from five affected counties just ask that the Navy relocate Growler pilot training to any one of dozens of suitable airfields away from historic communities and heritage farms that have been in families for generations.

She says, “I believe the attorney general’s lawsuit will have a chilling effect on constructive dialogue and solutions going forward.”

Attorney General Ferguson’s lawsuit is precisely because of the chilling effect of the Navy ignoring specific legal requirements for the environmental impact assessment.

Four thousand citizens, some military, submitted cogent comments, using the appropriate channels for constructive dialogue.

They believe, and the AG agrees, that the Navy did not follow required protocols and have asked for redress.

Ferguson’s point: No one, not even the military, is above the law. We are a nation of laws.

Norma Smith, a lawmaker herself, brings up irrelevant points with regard to the case brought by the attorney general.

The only relevant question, hopefully settled by his lawsuit, is: Did the Navy follow the law of the land in authorizing itself to increase Growler training flights at OLF and NASWI.

As vital as national security is, the military cannot function outside the laws of the nation it serves.

Vicki Robin

Langley

More in Letters to the Editor

Letter: What value is our freedom, citizenship, if unprotected?

Editor, Back in the 1970s, in a border state where party registration… Continue reading

Letter: Programs not socialism, won’t lead to serfdom

Editor, I read many letters warning about the dangers of socialism. It… Continue reading

Letter: Paris Accord is a dismal failure that gives false hope

Editor, I enjoyed reading Robert Boenish’s letter to the editor where Bob… Continue reading

Letter: Libaries are using funding wisely during difficult time

Editor, I will leave it to others to respond to Kurt Vieke… Continue reading

Letter: Greenbank Farm needs your support for maintenance, open spaces

Editor, Our island is extremely fortunate to have the Greenbank Farm open… Continue reading

Letter: Electromagnetic radiation has hidden health hazards

Editor, Having tuned into the Langley City Council meeting on Nov. 16… Continue reading

Letter: Updates to the state Growth Management Act needed

Editor, It’s the time of the year when we consider what we’re… Continue reading

Letter: Biden should rehire fired director of Cybersecurity, Infrastructure

Editor, Add the name of Chris Krebs, director of the Cybersecurity and… Continue reading

Letter: Hold the criticism of Biden till he has had time to do job

Editor, All politicians have something in common — they like the spotlight… Continue reading

Most Read