Letter: Fear Navy wasn’t working in good faith now confirmed

Editor,

I read in the Feb. 2 South Whidbey Record on Feb. 2 that the “Navy moves forward without Growler decision” and contracts are already signed to house the new Growler fleet as it grows to four times its present numbers.

For those who have worked in good faith, with due-diligent research, respect for the process, civil opposition and suggested viable alternatives, the headline confirms what we dreaded from the outset of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) process: In spite of our efforts to work in good faith with the Navy, they never had any intention of listening to us.

The whole process was a sham.

It’s difficult not to be angry. No one wants to be bullied. In considering our plight further, I have thought more about the word “impact” in the EIS process.

The meaning of impact, of course, can be applied both positively and negatively: a good impact or a bad one.

The anticipated impact of the Navy expansion, however, only bodes negative for those of us who will now have to live with the increased unacceptable level of noise and its disruption of our entire way of life.

The dictionary defines “impact” as “the action or effect or influence of one object coming forcibly [my emphasis] into contact with another.”

The root of the word traces back further to the Latin impingere or “driven in” and the word impinge has a negative meaning of “advancing over an area belonging to someone else; to encroach.”

The Navy Pentagon officials, most who do not live here, are forcibly “encroaching” on Whidbey Island and the region and on our way of life.

In any other proprietary context, this would well be considered illegal, and, in any case, it is a violation of our region’s sense of place and well-being.

I am not a veteran, but I have great respect for the core values I generally associate with the military: the sense of duty, the mission to protect, the discipline and the sense of honor.

The Navy clearly does not intend to protect us from the impact of the Growler noise, nor is it honorable in the way the Navy brass refuses to measure the intolerable sound of the Growlers and justifies it on the basis of a bogus averaging of the sound to make it “technically” within a range of acceptance.

I give them a “dishonorable discharge” for their refusal to honestly and protectively deal with the impact of Growler noise.

Somehow our communities need to continue to resist the Navy “advancing over an area belonging to someone else: to encroach” —- namely on our precious northwest corner of the United States.

The struggle must go on.

Tom Ewell

Clinton

More in Letters to the Editor

Letter: A quality mask perhaps better than $1,200 check

Editor, Taking a cue from my auto mechanic who always looks for… Continue reading

Letter: Price Johnson is a leader with extraordinary qualities

Editor, I am supporting Helen Price Johnson’s candidacy for state Senator and… Continue reading

Letter: Don’t keep businesses closed in order to protect elderly

Editor, Because I am over 70 years old I am considered at… Continue reading

Letter: Bacon would think globally, act locally as commissioner

Editor, The name Melanie Bacon will be on the Aug. 4 ballot… Continue reading

Letter: Other pandemic response scenario would be worse

Editor, Regarding those who think our civil liberties have been abridged and… Continue reading

Letter: Grateful to those doing their jobs during the pandemic

Editor, All around me there are efforts to thank those around us… Continue reading

Letter: Correcting the record on what Consitution does, doesn’t allow

Editor, I am responding tot he letter to the editor by Joseph… Continue reading

Letter: As a society, we cannot allow ’slave patrols,’ or lynchings

Editor, The killing of young black men and women because “we thought… Continue reading

Letter: For those who protesting mandates, please stop

Editor, This is a call for people to stop and think about… Continue reading

Most Read