Letter: Fear Navy wasn’t working in good faith now confirmed

Editor,

I read in the Feb. 2 South Whidbey Record on Feb. 2 that the “Navy moves forward without Growler decision” and contracts are already signed to house the new Growler fleet as it grows to four times its present numbers.

For those who have worked in good faith, with due-diligent research, respect for the process, civil opposition and suggested viable alternatives, the headline confirms what we dreaded from the outset of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) process: In spite of our efforts to work in good faith with the Navy, they never had any intention of listening to us.

The whole process was a sham.

It’s difficult not to be angry. No one wants to be bullied. In considering our plight further, I have thought more about the word “impact” in the EIS process.

The meaning of impact, of course, can be applied both positively and negatively: a good impact or a bad one.

The anticipated impact of the Navy expansion, however, only bodes negative for those of us who will now have to live with the increased unacceptable level of noise and its disruption of our entire way of life.

The dictionary defines “impact” as “the action or effect or influence of one object coming forcibly [my emphasis] into contact with another.”

The root of the word traces back further to the Latin impingere or “driven in” and the word impinge has a negative meaning of “advancing over an area belonging to someone else; to encroach.”

The Navy Pentagon officials, most who do not live here, are forcibly “encroaching” on Whidbey Island and the region and on our way of life.

In any other proprietary context, this would well be considered illegal, and, in any case, it is a violation of our region’s sense of place and well-being.

I am not a veteran, but I have great respect for the core values I generally associate with the military: the sense of duty, the mission to protect, the discipline and the sense of honor.

The Navy clearly does not intend to protect us from the impact of the Growler noise, nor is it honorable in the way the Navy brass refuses to measure the intolerable sound of the Growlers and justifies it on the basis of a bogus averaging of the sound to make it “technically” within a range of acceptance.

I give them a “dishonorable discharge” for their refusal to honestly and protectively deal with the impact of Growler noise.

Somehow our communities need to continue to resist the Navy “advancing over an area belonging to someone else: to encroach” —- namely on our precious northwest corner of the United States.

The struggle must go on.

Tom Ewell

Clinton

More in Letters to the Editor

Letter: Question is not about letter, but misinformation

Editor, At first glance, Mr. Meyer’s letter to the editor seems 180… Continue reading

Letter: Where is all the outrage now that Trump is gone

​Editor, I am curious as to why, in just a few months,… Continue reading

Letter: What is Critical Race Theory? Who is being canceled?

Editor, Thanks to Whidbey News Times for going mail delivery; I am… Continue reading

Letter: Finally figured out someone new in White House

Editor, Congratulations to your editorial board. The Dick Wright cartoon in the… Continue reading

Letter: Appreciative of a random act of kindness

Editor, On Saturday April 10, when picking up a meal from Gordon’s… Continue reading

Letter: Groups pose a direct threat to our democracy

Editor, The Jan. 6 insurrection demonstrated beyond any shadow of a doubt… Continue reading

Letter: Insurrectionists tried to cancel 81 million votes

Editor, I am writing in regard to a letter to the editor… Continue reading

Letter: Proud of Navy pilots for bravery, patriotism

Editor, Today, I stopped by the side of the road at Outlying… Continue reading

Letter: Superintendent shouldn’t earn more than Inslee

Editor, Upon receiving our 2021 property tax statement I noticed four different… Continue reading

Most Read