Letter: Just saying ‘no’ to sex education ineffective

Editor,

I just had to respond to the letter to the editor titled “Just say no to sex education in schools” in the Feb. 12 issue of the South Whidbey Record with a resounding “wow!”

The writer spends a full third of her letter equating too much sugar in a child’s diet to “diabetes, obesity and other health issues.” I assume the “reasoning” is that children will “enjoy the pleasure of sugar.” Which, it seems in the writer’s mind anyway, will lead to children having sex.

The writer claims sex education would be “stealing the innocence of children and sexualizing them,” causing a litany of problems like “the increase of abortions, divorce, STDs, suicides, nihilism, violence, poverty, homelessness, drug use, objectification of women and other destructive behaviors. Such instruction is the same as handing out drugs and alcohol in the classroom.” Wow! Again.

Research published by the Public Library of Science shows that, “when sex education is comprehensive, students feel more informed, make safer choices and have healthier outcomes —- resulting in fewer unplanned pregnancies and more protection against sexually transmitted diseases and infection.”

According to the World Population Review “the U.S. continues to have the highest teen pregnancy rate of all developed nations.” For example, the top three states for teen pregnancies according to this same study are Arkansas, Mississippi, and Oklahoma. All real good “Bible Belt” states.

Ironically these three states also have some of the highest “sexually transmitted disease” rates. So much for the effectiveness of “just say no.”

The biggest issue I have with this line of “just say no” reasoning is that it simply doesn’t work. To equate educating children with the truth about biology and human sexuality being the same as “handing out drugs and alcohol in the classroom” is, in my opinion, a stunning failure to do your due diligence on behalf of the children and says to children that “willful ignorance” is acceptable.

Sex education based on facts is not dangerous to children, but willful ignorance is.

Dan Freeman

Clinton

More in Letters to the Editor

Letter: Good Cheer is here for all in need, no questions asked

Editor, At times like these, Good Cheer is here for our community.… Continue reading

Letter: Neighbors helping neighbors in the Coupeville way

Editor, Last Monday, our neighbors across the street, Rob and Traci York,… Continue reading

Letter: Hospital management doing all it can

Editor, Hospital management is doing all it can as small systems close… Continue reading

Letter: Price Johnson the kind of leader needed in Olympia

Editor, The first time I saw Helen Price Johnson was at a… Continue reading

Letter: Hospital was impacted but will get through this difficult time

Editor, A recently published letter to Gov. Jay Inslee has caused concern.… Continue reading

Letter: Don’t need the $1,200 check? Maybe share with those who do

Editor, Soon, many of us will receive $1,200 checks from the U.S.… Continue reading

Letter: Grocery store workers should all be commended

Editor, I just returned from grocery shopping at Payless in Freeland. I… Continue reading

Letter: Maybe you feel great, but you can still be contagious

Editor, I’m glad to see more and more people following the 6-foot… Continue reading

Letter: Let store, postal workers know they’re appreciated

Editor, In these strange times where you are urged to self isolate… Continue reading

Most Read