Letter: Not anti-defense; against being ‘collateral damage’

Editor,

I read the South Whidbey Record Dec. 5 article, “Navy ends talks on impacts on historic district” and got the distinct impression that this was the move of a “military proconsul” administrator assigned to make sure the population of the region surrounding the military base was “compliant” to any operations of the Navy no matter the damages to the environment and the human beings that live here.

According to the article, the Navy would “provide a total of $450,000 for preservation work, a cultural landscape inventory and a gateway sign.” I assume the sign would be a warning that reads, “the Navy will not be responsible for irreparable damages to any and all humans in this region.”

The Navy terminated these talks, leaving state historical preservation officer Allyson Brooks to comment, “We felt we were still negotiating.”

The sticking point, according to reserve manager Kristen Griffin, “was defining the scale of the impact the change will have on historic properties.

And that comes down to money.”

The preservation interests suggested “$2 million to stabilize concrete structures in Fort Casey and Fort Ebey state parks, $2 million to rehabilitate the Coupeville Wharf and $1.8 million for work preserving the Ferry House.”

Congressman Larsen was disappointed an agreement couldn’t be reached. Yet he suggested something might be worked out.

Gov. Inslee suggested “to mitigate this effect, the U.S. Navy should provide funding to stabilize historic barns and structures as well as soundproof historic homes, helping to preserve the sense of community in this unique setting.”

Are these newly “soundproofed” homes to be opened to humans that still live in this region to work and sleep in when the Growlers “bounce?” That would be absurd, wouldn’t it? Kind of like the Navy offering $450,000 for preservation work. Absurd.

The Navy burns through $16,000 per hour to fly a plane that costs $67 million to buy, yet doesn’t have the funds to build an air station in a remote, uninhabited part of the country to “bounce” these monstrosities?

I am not anti-defense. I am against being collateral damage to military arrogance.

Dan Freeman

Clinton

More in Letters to the Editor

Letter: Families who adopt are honored this month

Editor, ‘Tis the season for giving thanks. That is why the month… Continue reading

Letter: Drive safe and have a happy Thanksgiving

Editor, Regarding Thanksgiving, to paraphrase another holiday’s song: it’s (one of) the… Continue reading

Letter: No Community Harvest planned this year

Editor, On behalf of the North Whidbey Community Harvest, I would like… Continue reading

Letter: Thanks to Whidbey emergency personnel

Editor, I would like to express my deepest thanks to the Whidbey… Continue reading

Letter: Amazon should be encouraged to fix delivery issues

Editor, I am, like most of us here on the south end… Continue reading

Letter: RVs parked on side of roads are a concern

Editor, Is there a new RV park on Oak Harbor Road/Street? In… Continue reading

Letter: Port should continue to explore ideas

Editor, Thank you to all who supported my effort to become the… Continue reading

Letter: Campgrounds should be a top priority for park and rec levy

Editor, The recent news article about the South Whidbey Parks and Rec… Continue reading

Letter: Public entity should take over Oak Harbor airport

Editor, I read with interest the article in the Whidbey News-Times on… Continue reading

Letter: What happened to acting for the common good?

Editor, Remarkably sad how thinking has changed regarding freedom, the common good… Continue reading

Letter: Vaccines should be required for everyone

Editor: To prevent further spread of the coronavirus, we should require everyone… Continue reading

Letter: COER wants to degrade Navy efficiency

Editor, I listened to the recent summary judgment hearing in federal court… Continue reading