Letter: Patriot Prayer can’t decide law is unconstitutional

Editor,

First, a quote: “Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited … It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.”

If we were to use this as a yardstick to determine if Initiative 1639, the gun control measure passed by voters last year, is constitutional, then I’d have to conclude yes. There is nothing in I-1639 that stops me from buying a gun. It will require — among other things — a background check and waiting period. But none of these add up to denying me the right to own a gun.

On Saturday, Feb 1, the group Patriot Prayer held a gathering here on Whidbey Island called “Enforce the Second Amendment: Island County.” It was specifically directed toward I-1639, which they believe is unconstitutional.

Of course, Patriot Prayer is free to believe whatever they wish about the Constitution and I-1639. And the same is true for all of us. What they can not do is presume to speak for me or the majority of voters in this state, and they cannot decide for the rest of us which laws are constitutional and which are not, despite how they feel about them.

That is decided by our courts.

One way they’ve been furthering their position is by asking local elected officials in our state to adopt an ordinance or oath that says they will not enforce “any unconstitutional laws, particularly I-1639.”

There are two issues I have with this. First, all people elected in our state already take an oath where they swear to support the constitutions of our country and our state, and all local ordinances. So, what Patriot Prayer is asking for is redundant and is not needed.

The second reason gets to the real heart of matter: Patriot Prayer is not just asking for elected officials to support the Constitution, but to support Patriot Prayer’s interpretation of it.

And if elected officials buy into this it means they are going beyond their jobs of enforcing the law, and are instead assigning themselves the role of interpreting the law, and then deciding what parts of it they agree or don’t agree with.

This is going far beyond their elected roles and duties, and is in fact neither supporting our constitution, nor supporting our democracy.

Getting back to the quote above. Whom did it come from? Was it Obama, Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, or any number of other extremists, anarchist, leftist, chicken littles, or knee-jerkers? No.

The quote is from the late, conservative Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, whom I think was far more familiar with the Constitution than I am. And I strongly suspect he knew more about it than Patriot Prayer does as well.

David Freed,

Clinton

More in Letters to the Editor

Letter: Time to speak the truth about Jan. 6

Editor, One year ago Jan. 6, 2021, our country survived an insurrection… Continue reading

Letter: City’s neglect of road in low-income area troubling

Editor, Your Wednesday, Jan. 5 editorial on the city’s mismanagement of Oak… Continue reading

Letter: Claims about Omicron arrogant and unsubstantiated

Editor, I am responding to Al William’s Jan. 5 letter, “Omicron may… Continue reading

Letter: Hannold is not a moderate candidate

Editor, In the Dec. 29 article about the Republican candidates for county… Continue reading

Letter: Island lucky to have many excellent chefs

Editor, We are fortunate to live on The Rock for so many… Continue reading

Letter: America needs a strong military to stay safe, free

Editor, I’m writing in response to the Arcese and Campbell letter, South… Continue reading

Letter: Whidbey needs rational housing options

Editor, We need rational housing choices in Island County for young people… Continue reading

Letter: Meeting set for superintendents to talk levies

Editor, The League of Women Voters of Whidbey Island will host a… Continue reading

Letter: ‘Mega-donor’ label is overly broad

Editor, I found Scott Smith’s recent letter concerning Nancy Nordoff’s campaign contributions… Continue reading

Most Read