Letter: The OLF was here long before noise naysayers

Editor,

I moved to Whidbey Island about four years ago. Though prices were attractive, due to the noise I purposely did not buy near or in the noise footprint of the Outlying Field Coupeville. And I love the sound and sight of jets. Given the OLF has been located where it currently resides and flying jets for the better part of 50 years, I suspect that most of those who now live close by and find the noise so hurtful that they call for the closure of the OLF, moved in after the OLF.

As for noise, arguing that one aircraft is louder than another is to argue how many magic fairies we can put on the head of a pin. Yes, some aircraft are quieter than others, but given the mission of the OLF, to train aircrews to land aboard the boat, full throttle/military throttle is required as soon as the main mounts hit the tarmac, and remain at full thrust as their aircraft claws its way back into the air in order to “go around” and make another attempt at landing.

I would put forward that any tactical Navy jet now flying would be horrendously loud, and there’s not a darn thing the Navy or the air crews can do about it.

It’s all about the safety of the air crews. Period, full stop. Field Carrier Landing Practice is a required and often practiced evolution.

Without FCLPs, more aircrews crash and burn trying to get aboard the boat. There’s no way around it, landing aboard ship during the day and night is a very perishable skill that requires constant practice and full concentration And it needs to be close to the NAS.

It needs to be in a flat or open areas with little or no light intrusion for night flying.

The OLF is manned by NAS Whidbey crew, but only when in use.

It’s so tight a pattern and close to the ground and the tower, that it can’t be done at the NAS Whidbey unless all other flight operations at the NAS were completely stopped. There must be an OLF and it must be very close to the NAS Whidbey. There is no other choice.

Yes, I agree that it is very loud and the noise is intrusive, but the OLF is an absolute regiment to support naval aviation.

Why anyone chose to live under that activity is up to them, but to now come back and make up stories about louder aircraft or question the need for the OLF in the first place is not reasonable.

The OLF is 100 percent about safety of our aircrews and I have every reason to believe that the Navy works to mitigate the associated noise. Its use is directly related to saving lives.

Until technology develops quiet jet engines, any and all OLFs spread across the nation will continue to be loud.

Jim Innes

Oak Harbor

More in Letters to the Editor

Letter: A place on Whidbey to take family

Editor, Spring is fast approaching, and nowhere is it more evident than… Continue reading

Letter: Don’t like the deer in Coupeville? Move to the city

Editor, Regarding the deer in Coupeville article by Kira Erickson in the… Continue reading

Letter: Trump thought he might lose reelection bid

Editor, Why I think former President Trump thought he might lose re-election… Continue reading

Letter: Tantamount to fake wrestling, the kind with bad hair

Editor, This is a response to a letter by Edward Drum, who… Continue reading

Letter: Attacks on AP history teacher unfounded

Editor, We’ve heard from some very opinionated folks on the state of… Continue reading

Letter: UW prof’s idea for tunnel is full of holes

Editor, The UW prof’s idea for a tunnel to replace the Clinton-to-Mukilteo… Continue reading

Letter: Allowed to voice concerns about kids’ education

Editor, As the father of two children, I would like to take… Continue reading

Letter: Vaccinations went quickly, seamlessly

Editor, What a great community we live in. My husband and I… Continue reading

Letter: Don’t censor, but sharing Drum letter unnecessary

Editor, I’d like to take a moment to address the letter from… Continue reading

Most Read