Letter: The OLF was here long before noise naysayers

Editor,

I moved to Whidbey Island about four years ago. Though prices were attractive, due to the noise I purposely did not buy near or in the noise footprint of the Outlying Field Coupeville. And I love the sound and sight of jets. Given the OLF has been located where it currently resides and flying jets for the better part of 50 years, I suspect that most of those who now live close by and find the noise so hurtful that they call for the closure of the OLF, moved in after the OLF.

As for noise, arguing that one aircraft is louder than another is to argue how many magic fairies we can put on the head of a pin. Yes, some aircraft are quieter than others, but given the mission of the OLF, to train aircrews to land aboard the boat, full throttle/military throttle is required as soon as the main mounts hit the tarmac, and remain at full thrust as their aircraft claws its way back into the air in order to “go around” and make another attempt at landing.

I would put forward that any tactical Navy jet now flying would be horrendously loud, and there’s not a darn thing the Navy or the air crews can do about it.

It’s all about the safety of the air crews. Period, full stop. Field Carrier Landing Practice is a required and often practiced evolution.

Without FCLPs, more aircrews crash and burn trying to get aboard the boat. There’s no way around it, landing aboard ship during the day and night is a very perishable skill that requires constant practice and full concentration And it needs to be close to the NAS.

It needs to be in a flat or open areas with little or no light intrusion for night flying.

The OLF is manned by NAS Whidbey crew, but only when in use.

It’s so tight a pattern and close to the ground and the tower, that it can’t be done at the NAS Whidbey unless all other flight operations at the NAS were completely stopped. There must be an OLF and it must be very close to the NAS Whidbey. There is no other choice.

Yes, I agree that it is very loud and the noise is intrusive, but the OLF is an absolute regiment to support naval aviation.

Why anyone chose to live under that activity is up to them, but to now come back and make up stories about louder aircraft or question the need for the OLF in the first place is not reasonable.

The OLF is 100 percent about safety of our aircrews and I have every reason to believe that the Navy works to mitigate the associated noise. Its use is directly related to saving lives.

Until technology develops quiet jet engines, any and all OLFs spread across the nation will continue to be loud.

Jim Innes

Oak Harbor

More in Letters to the Editor

Consider the facts and vote for water infrastructure bond

Editor, I am responding to the letter from Mr. Moses of Edgecliff… Continue reading

Letter: Groundwater management is a much needed component

Editor, The Langley Infrastructure Program handout of May 28 states that the… Continue reading

Letter: Cyr is ‘smart, personable, progressive,’ right for job

Editor, I join the chorus of voices urging citizens to elect Craig… Continue reading

Letter: Don’t buy into ‘myths’ about septic pollution

Editor, In response to Tim Callison’s letter to the editor in the… Continue reading

Letter: Navy naysayers may not like the consequences

Editor, To the misguided citizens trying so very hard to force the… Continue reading

Letter: Reject the water system bond, focus on repairs

Editor, The city wants more money for a “Water Management System Improvement… Continue reading

Letter: In search of rank-and-file supporters with integrity

Editor, I write today to decry all Republicans, and others, who still… Continue reading

Letter: Moving from California doesn’t mean Californian

Editor, My wife and I recently moved to Whidbey Island from Southern… Continue reading

Most Read