Cartoon for Saturday, Jan. 20

  • Friday, January 19, 2018 2:55pm
  • Opinion

Many people may be surprised to learn that there’s a statute of limitations on rape in Washington state.

There’s currently a bill in the state Senate that would do away with the time limits on prosecution for the most serious rape and sexual assault offenses. It passed in the state House of Representatives last year.

A bill that makes life tougher for rapists may seem like an easy sell, but the issue is more complicated than it seems on the surface.

Still, the bill deserves a hearing with the state Law and Justice committee and a vote before the full Senate. Sen. Jamie Pedersen, D-Seattle, is currently holding it up, according to a story by Taylor McAvoy with the WNPA Olympia News Bureau. The story is online at www.southwhidbeyrecord.com

Currently, the law is somewhat complicated. Rape in the first and second degree can be prosecuted for up to 10 years if the crime is reported within a year; otherwise it’s three years. Sex crimes against children may be prosecuted up until the victim’s 30th birthday.

Pedersen argues murder is the only crime that should be without a statute of limitations because people deserve to go on with their lives, the story says.

That’s nonsense. Providing rapists with a sense of relief is not a good reason for keeping a statute of limitations.

But there are some legitimate arguments to be considered.

Prosecutors are concerned that eliminating the statute of limitations on these crimes would give victims unrealistic expectations about the possibility of a conviction when cases get harder and harder to prove as the years go by. Witnesses die, memories fade, evidence gets lost.

The rights of the accused should also be considered as it’s harder to defend against accusations of a crime that allegedly occurred many years prior.

On the other hand, DNA evidence can identify an unknown perpetrator years after a crime. It would be unjust for rapists to go unpunished because of a somewhat arbitrary time limit, especially when there’s very convincing evidence against them.

The Washington Association for Prosecuting Attorneys had opposed the elimination of statute of limitations on sex crimes for years but changed its stance, largely because of advances in DNA analysis and other technology.

There’s understandably a lot of emotion wrapped up in laws dealing with sex crimes, but elimination of the statute of limitations is an issue that needs to be calmly and logically considered by lawmakers in Olympia — not held up in committee by one senator.

More in Opinion

Letter: Quoting Scripture proves nothing about immigration

Editor, Re: Atty. Gen. Jeff Sessions quoting the Bible to support separating… Continue reading

Sound Off: Proposed Island Transit fares don’t add up

As a local leader, I work to improve regional mobility in support… Continue reading

Letter: Clinton beach AccessMats make beach accessible for everyone

Editor, Now that the winter weather is past, Island Beach Access has… Continue reading

County planning commission’s remarks were shameful

Homeless people like to live in the woods and should just stay… Continue reading

Letter: Trump’s immigration policy violates human rights

Editor, Trump’s new immigration policy is even worse than previously thought. Since… Continue reading

Road will keep island traversable if highway is blocked

Island County commissioners’ decision to spend $4 million to build a short… Continue reading

Letter: Island Transit fares should do no harm, minimize impact

Editor, Tom Walker, in a letter to the editor in the June… Continue reading

Letter: Rather than berate newspaper staff, why not educate others?

Editor, In reply to Captn Blynd: I was never even aware of… Continue reading

Letter: America should treat immigrants and children humanely

Editor, Trump’s immigration policy is treating it as a criminal problem in… Continue reading

Most Read