No, not all scientists agree on global warming


Thanks Ms. Mayhew for furnishing a listing of a large number of your “believers,” however their claim of a catastrophe that will result from the supposed “global warming” is not accepted by the entire scientific community. In fact there are many prominent, respected global scientists who reject their proposal. Their voices, however, have been dismissed as “cranks” or deniers or skeptics by the believers. So, in order to give this discussion balance their views and input to this controversy should be considered.

Here are a few quotes from some prominent, respected scientists.

The first is Dr. Daniel Botkin, president of the Center for the Study of the Environment and professor emeritus in the Department of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology at the University of California.

“Some colleagues who shared some of my doubts argue that the only way to get our society to change is to frighten people with the possibility of a catastrophe and that therefore it is all right and even necessary for scientists to exaggerate. They tell me that my belief in open and honest assessment is naive.”

“Wolves deceive their prey, don’t they? One said to me recently, ‘Therefore, biologically, we are justified in exaggerating to get society to change.’”

Interesting what?

A second voice is Dr. Richard S. Lindzen, professor of atmospheric sciences, MIT; member of the National Academy of Sciences and former lead author, UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

“Future generations will wonder in bemused amazement that the early 21st century’s developed world went into hysterical panic over a globally averaged temperature increase of a few tenths of a degree, and on the basis of gross exaggerations of highly uncertain computer projections combined into implausible chains of inference proceeded to contemplate a roll back of the industrial age.”



More in Letters to the Editor

IDIPIC needs volunteers to serve as speakers, helpers

Editor, In 2017, the Impaired Driving Impact Panel of Island County presented… Continue reading

Vote ‘yes’ to maintain island’s library services

Editor, I am writing to encourage you to vote yes for libraries.… Continue reading

Check you facts when talking gun control

Editor, In Lorinda Newton’s March 10 letter, she contends that states with… Continue reading

Guns need as much, if not more, training as cars

Editor, Lorinda Newton’s March 10 letter makes a great argument for the… Continue reading

If guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have them

Editor, Each mass shooting grieves my soul, be it at a school,… Continue reading

Need to start listening to children about guns

Editor, The latest advice from conservative Newt Gingrich: “Let’s arm teachers.” What… Continue reading

Don’t miss out on Uganda’s dancers Friday

Editor, South Whidbey Islanders: Please rejoice and welcome the dozen-plus young people… Continue reading

We’re still blowin’ in the wind

Editor, Over 50 years ago, Bob Dylan recorded “Blowin’ in the Wind,”… Continue reading

I – 1600 volunteer because healthcare is a human right

Editor, Whole Washington is an ambitious group of citizens and health care… Continue reading

Council should focus on commercial incentives

Editor, The underlying concern expressed in the South Whidbey Record’s editorial “Live… Continue reading

Machine Shop offers valuable enrichment

Editor, As a South Whidbey resident and mother of three, I was… Continue reading

Let’s just keep young people out of Langley

Editor, To the members of Langley Association of Neighbors Downtown in the… Continue reading