No, not all scientists agree on global warming

Editor,

Thanks Ms. Mayhew for furnishing a listing of a large number of your “believers,” however their claim of a catastrophe that will result from the supposed “global warming” is not accepted by the entire scientific community. In fact there are many prominent, respected global scientists who reject their proposal. Their voices, however, have been dismissed as “cranks” or deniers or skeptics by the believers. So, in order to give this discussion balance their views and input to this controversy should be considered.

Here are a few quotes from some prominent, respected scientists.

The first is Dr. Daniel Botkin, president of the Center for the Study of the Environment and professor emeritus in the Department of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology at the University of California.

“Some colleagues who shared some of my doubts argue that the only way to get our society to change is to frighten people with the possibility of a catastrophe and that therefore it is all right and even necessary for scientists to exaggerate. They tell me that my belief in open and honest assessment is naive.”

“Wolves deceive their prey, don’t they? One said to me recently, ‘Therefore, biologically, we are justified in exaggerating to get society to change.’”

Interesting what?

A second voice is Dr. Richard S. Lindzen, professor of atmospheric sciences, MIT; member of the National Academy of Sciences and former lead author, UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

“Future generations will wonder in bemused amazement that the early 21st century’s developed world went into hysterical panic over a globally averaged temperature increase of a few tenths of a degree, and on the basis of gross exaggerations of highly uncertain computer projections combined into implausible chains of inference proceeded to contemplate a roll back of the industrial age.”

RON WYMAN

Clinton

More in Letters to the Editor

Letter: Americans should celebrate social programs, safety nets

Editor, Dear Americans, are you for or against Social Security? Here’s what… Continue reading

Letter: Ferry spokesman gave reporter false information

Editor, Reporter Laura Guido was given false information by Ian Sterling, “a… Continue reading

Letter: Pay bumps for our school leaders are well-deserved

Editor, The purpose of this letter is to provide information to the… Continue reading

Letter: Neighbor dog is not the problem, claims are unfair

Editor, This is in response to Steve Trembley’s letter regarding a dog… Continue reading

Letter: The U.S’s world standing depends on ousting Trump

Editor, Donald J. Trump gives aid and comfort to dictators around the… Continue reading

Letter: There are many benefits to an extra hour of sun

Editor, I read with alarm the plans to go to year-round daylight… Continue reading

Letter: Navy decision is based on ‘fear mongering’

Editor, I read with 100 percent anger and horror about the Navy’s… Continue reading

Letter: WhidbeyHealth shouldn’t be turning away patients

Editor, My wife has been taking allergy shots since November of 2017.… Continue reading

Letter: South Whidbey school administration raises seem questionable

Editor, The South Whidbey Record reported on March 2 the salary increases… Continue reading

Most Read