Enjoyed watching the public process work


As the owner, along with my wife Holly, of two storefront businesses in downtown Langley it was gratifying to attend the Planning Advisory Board meeting on Wednesday and see the public process operate the way it is supposed to. City Hall was proposing a zoning change that was not popular with nearby residents nor necessary to accommodate the needs of the property owner.

This proposal was crafted without the input of those most affected by the decision. The residents formed a community group and worked their way into the process, bringing the issue to the Planning Advisory Board. Voices were respectfully listened to and a consensus was reached that satisfied the nearby residents and the property owner. Now it’s up to the council to do the right thing and approve the measure.

This is what should happen with the First Street Redesign in downtown Langley. City Hall determined their course of action behind closed doors. The local business owners were not a part of the process that determined that angled parking should be changed to parallel parking resulting in the loss of at least 12 spaces.

This is parking crucial to the economic vitality of these businesses. This change would allow for no ADA parking on all of First Street. First Street has an historic quality that works.

It is not necessary to tear it apart and build something new. I went door to door asking the business owners what they thought and almost all of them are opposed to this change. More reasonable alternatives exist that address all of the above concerns and improve First Street.

A group of business owners, planning professionals and concerned citizens is organizing to restart the public process to include the opinions of the small business owners of Langley and their customers to create a solution for First Street that works for all users.

To quote the Washington State Open Meetings act: The people of this state do not yield their sovereignty to the agencies which serve them. The people, in delegating authority, do not give their public servants the right to decide what is good for the people to know and what is not good for them to know. The people insist on remaining informed so that they may retain control over the instruments they have created.

David Price


More in Letters to the Editor

Check you facts when talking gun control

Editor, In Lorinda Newton’s March 10 letter, she contends that states with… Continue reading

Guns need as much, if not more, training as cars

Editor, Lorinda Newton’s March 10 letter makes a great argument for the… Continue reading

If guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have them

Editor, Each mass shooting grieves my soul, be it at a school,… Continue reading

Need to start listening to children about guns

Editor, The latest advice from conservative Newt Gingrich: “Let’s arm teachers.” What… Continue reading

Don’t miss out on Uganda’s dancers Friday

Editor, South Whidbey Islanders: Please rejoice and welcome the dozen-plus young people… Continue reading

Focus gun control on assault rifles

Editor, Mr. Fred Stillwell’s recent letter in which he attempts to create… Continue reading

Thankful to community for festival support

Editor, Island Shakespeare Festival presented its first indoor production in January at… Continue reading

Banning all guns isn’t the answer to mass shootings

Editor, In reply to Sharron Gray’s Feb. 3 letter to the editor,… Continue reading

Concerned with safety of island and country

Editor, I was concerned about the Feb. 7 article “Law will allow… Continue reading

Roundabout isn’t safe solution to traffic

Editor, The Washington State Department of Transportation has not put traffic counters… Continue reading

Thank you for urging responsible climate change action

Editor, Thank you for your editorial urging responsible action in confronting climate… Continue reading

Irony in Navy, civillian responses to security

Editor, Naval Air Station Whidbey Island just concluded a two-week drill which… Continue reading