Letter: Arguments being made against jets hold no water


All these anti-Growler/OLF letters are interesting for the lack of facts and heavy duty innuendo and blame. This week, we’re treated to the “not here first” argument. Someone weeks ago mentioned the Salish Sea and the whales and fish that were here long before Naval Air Station Whidbey Island.

True, but that logic that leads the author to somehow use it as a reason to get rid of the base and OLF Coupeville means that people need to leave Whidbey, too, as the whales and birds and fish were here long before mankind. So, let’s start packing up, huh?

The argument is simple. OLF started using jets for flight landing practices between the years 1965-67.

If you moved here after 1967, moved into a house under the noise print of OLF, then you were not here before the Navy.

You voluntarily put yourself under that noise. And in the mid 60s, they were flying A3Ds. really loud aircraft.

As for recent “facts”:

• Nope, the Growler is not the loudest plane in history and no it wasn’t designed to be loud.

• Nope, not just rookies fly at OLF, but all boat bound/tactical air crews do. Experienced and inexperienced. It’s for safety learning how to fly aboard the boat. It’s 100 percent required, and often, by all aircrews.

• Nope, the aircrews do not purposely make noise, or fly unsafely, or heinously fly over houses, playgrounds and schools. Stop making stuff up, please.

• Nope, the “other side of the mountains” or “just go to JBLM” are not options at all. Zero chance, zero value in any such idea. It’s NIMBY, pure and simple.

If some folks were here before the OLF got jets, then I’m sorry for that change for you, but civilization sometimes brings changes. People used to buy cheap hunting cabins on Mercer Island in the past; no more. Folks had to move in order to build Interstate 5. Bill Boeing built wood furniture. Change.

For those who moved in after 1967, you made a choice to live with the noise, so live with it. Why do you think the price of those homes were so reasonable, anyway?

By the way, no one defends a vicious attack dog and that analogy is ridiculous.

Nope, the Navy is not destroying citizens and shame on those who make it so personal against the Navy or supporters of the Navy. Hyperbolic fake news is what that kind of invective is.

Granted, the noise is very, very loud at OLF and at the NAS. No argument.

Jim Innes

Oak Harbor

More in Letters to the Editor

Letter: Sound Water Stewards not responsible for petition

Editor, Sound Water Stewards of Island County thanks all who joined us… Continue reading

Letter: Nation’s health care system is broken

Editor, Donald Trump and others say that “Medicare for All” is socialism,… Continue reading

Letter: Climate change affects us all

Editor, Bravo for the letter Annie Philp and Maggie Nattress sent to… Continue reading

Letter: Grateful for advice from local law enforcement

Editor, Thank God for the Freeland deputies, where my wife and I… Continue reading

Letter: Thanks given to the first responders

Editor, Gratitude to the 911 responders and, especially, to the wonderful kind… Continue reading

Letter: Fireworks can be much too traumatizing for pets

Editor, Years ago our family dog of 12 years died as the… Continue reading

Letter: Don’t be suckered by calls asking you for money

Editor, Many of us frequently receive telemarketer and robocalls from money solicitors… Continue reading

Letter: Coffee shop’s generosity a boost for nonprofit

Editor, Whidbey Island Nourishes is celebrating the success of another Heart to… Continue reading

Letter: Just saying ‘no’ to sex education ineffective

Editor, I just had to respond to the letter to the editor… Continue reading

Most Read