Langley leaders: consider Freeland sewer offer cautiously

Editor,

With regard to offering Langley wastewater treatment capacity to assist Freeland, there is much to be considered and I hope Langley leaders will proceed very cautiously. There are two issues that immediately come to mind:

First, the Langley treatment plant is required by Washington State to have what is known as “reserve capacity.” Reserve capacity allows for future growth based on the “medium population growth rate” within the Langley Urban Growth Area (UGA), according to Langley’s “2015 General Sewer System Plan.” The plant is currently operating at 50 percent capacity. Per the current sewer system plan, in 17 years, the projected flows within Langley city limits will be at 70 percent. However, the plant is required to maintain a 20 percent reserve capacity. When the plant is operating at 80 percent capacity, meaning within 20 percent of its maximum capacity, it is required by Washington State to add capacity. And as Freeland is finding out, capacity is very, very expensive. The Langley treatment plant most assuredly does not have the capacity to handle twice its current load without significant investment by Langley ratepayers to build out capacity or potentially upgrade the plant to a completely new design.

The second issue is that there are significant areas within Langley city limits that are currently not serviced by sewers. Langley city leaders must be sure that these unserved areas within the UGA are considered before giving away current capacity to serve others outside the UGA.

I encourage everyone to seek out the “2015 General Sewer System Plan.” And I look forward to reading the Pace Engineering report referred to in the article when it is posted. These are very important documents, and all Langley citizens should read them and pay close attention.

CRAIG CYR

Langley

More in Letters to the Editor

Letter:Shout out to local restaurants for being very child-friendly

Editor, I wanted to take a moment to thank all the restaurants… Continue reading

Letter:A story of ‘adventure’ with WhidbeyHeath referral

Editor, This may amuse other Whidbey residents who’ve dealt with WhidbeyHealth. A… Continue reading

Letter: Drunk driving laws in state need to be reviewed, improved

Editor, I don’t write letters normally, and here I am with the… Continue reading

Letter: Contrast between Trump, Obama could not be any greater

Editor, During the first weekend of September we witnessed a memorial service… Continue reading

Letter: Reasons to elect Janet St. Clair as commissioner

Editor, I’m voting for Janet St. Clair for Island County commissioner 3.… Continue reading

Letter: The loud ‘sound of freedom’ drowns out everything else

Editor, It’s 6 p.m. A gorgeous, warm, late summer evening. But we… Continue reading

Letter: Ultimate Frisbee a safer sport than football — switch it out

Editor, I read with pleasure the article last week about local Whidbey… Continue reading

Letter: Buyers beware of the listed property descriptions online

Editor, Talk about ‘caveat emptor.’ I recently submitted a complaint to the… Continue reading

Letter: Striving to provide the best in recreation programs, parks

Editor, We write this letter to thank the South Whidbey community for… Continue reading

Letter: Restoration project needs experts who’ve walked beach

Editor, Small fish were jumping by the dozens in the Hidden Beach… Continue reading

Letter: Administration spouts lies, nonsense; vote in November

Editor, “Truth isn’t truth.” Come on, Giuliani, what kind of baloney is… Continue reading

Letter: Teachers deserve excellent, salaries, sustainable ones

Editor, The South Whidbey School District is currently bargaining with its teachers.… Continue reading