It’s not perfect, but becoming inclusive is a good thing

  • Saturday, November 25, 2017 6:00am
  • Opinion

The Langley City Council finally took a stand.

It wasn’t the toughest stand. It wasn’t enough to satisfy all the critics. But it was something.

Monday night, Councilman Bruce Allen resurrected a much-debated ordinance to make the Village By the Sea into an inclusive city, which translates to “sanctuary city” to most people. The ordinance seeks to limits the city’s cooperation with the federal government in enforcing immigration laws and prohibits the targeting of people based on religious, ethnic, civil or immigration status.

Allen seemed to surprise both his colleagues and a small audience of onlookers when he took the ordinance off the shelf, where it had been placed in June. Allen, in fact, had been against the ordinance but now said he’s pushing it forward to avoid the discord of the past.

It ended up passing in a 3-0 vote.

It was a sneaky and surprising turn of events, especially considering Allen’s especially ardent opposition to the ordinance in the past. The item wasn’t on the agenda for the meeting and citizens weren’t given a chance to comment before it was passed that night.

The bombshell nature of Allen’s actions will surely make people speculate about his motives for doing it that way. Was it a reaction to the election of candidates in favor of making Langley an inclusive city? A way to save face? Whatever his reasoning, it was a thoroughly undemocratic way to get an ordinance passed.

The ordinance isn’t perfect. It’s watered down and toothless, as members of the advocacy group Inclusive Langley were quick to point out. They say it prevents city staff from being held accountable if they violate the ordinance. Still, the point of the ordinance is largely about symbolism anyway. Its adoption means that Langley has joined the ranks of communities that became inclusive or sanctuary cities. It’s a stand against racial profiling and the kind of anti-immigrant blather Donald Trump has been spewing since before he became president.

Perhaps Langley’s ordinance will be tweaked or replaced when the newly elected council members come on board. Perhaps the council will choose to leave a combustible issue alone.

We don’t like the way it was done and wish the ordinance could hold public officials and Langley police officers accountable. But, members of the city council and the citizens of Langley should be proud to live in an inclusive community.

It may not be the best start, but it’s a start.

More in Opinion

Cartoon for Aug. 18, 2018

Cartoon for Aug. 18, 2018… Continue reading

Letter: Tell superintendent, school board to raise teacher pay

Editor, Through its McCleary decision, the Washington State Supreme Court concluded that… Continue reading

Sound Off: When there’s no time, it’s time to ask questions

At this time of year, there is no time to waste on… Continue reading

Cartoon for Aug. 15, 2018

Cartoon for Aug. 15, 2018… Continue reading

Letter: Whidbey Habitat for Humanity grateful for all its supporters

Editor, Thank you to our supporters. It has never been more important… Continue reading

Sound Off: Media plays key role in preserving American democracy

By Fred Obee The plight of a grieving orca who continues to… Continue reading

Letter: What are Trump’s supporters thinking?

Editor, And speaking of MAGA hats in Langley and elsewhere, it is… Continue reading

Letter: ‘Liberal’ is not a dirty word, despite what Commissioner Hannold said

Editor, It is ironic and disturbing that Commissioner Hannold, in his quest… Continue reading

Letter: Hannold needs to stop dividing those he is representing

Editor, Rick Hannold. A public servant and commissioner. Went to a planning… Continue reading

Most Read