To the editor:
The Navy is accepting public comments on its plan to expand testing for new weapons systems, involving ships, jets, submarines and advanced sonar, and the sinking of depleted uranium munitions to the sea floor. The Navy has completed its environmental impact study and this study is open to public comment until Feb. 18.
We support the “No Action Alternative” (maintaining existing levels of training activities) because of the proven and possible adverse impacts of the expanded activities. Sonar can have detrimental effects on the ears of orcas and other marine mammals, resulting in disorientation and sometimes beaching. According to orca experts, the loss of hearing for a whale or dolphin almost certainly leads to death. Puget Sound’s orcas are already nearing extinction. There are many unanswered questions as well.
What, for example, are the long-term effects of heavy metals such as tungsten and depleted uranium on the marine environment and human health? At risk is the entire food chain. The plan is wide-ranging, impacting not only our immediate environment but extending south to California.
A final question might be: Why are we directing our energies into elaborate plans and preparation for destruction when we have opportunities for peaceful negotiation? Especially in a time of limited natural and economic resources.
Please send your comments to the Navy through their Web site, www.nwtrangecomplexeis/EIS.aspx, and also contact your representatives. Feb. 18 is the deadline.
Joyce Collette, Ann Dannhauer, Linda Edling, Denise Lilien, Kestrel Pope, Lori Ray Rubin, Netsah and Michael Zylinsky
Whidbey Island
