Letter: Letter writer was spot-on about Growler concerns

Editor,

Kudos for Dave Anderson’s strong review of the many arguments for shifting the anticipated tripling of Growler practice to places off of Whidbey. He also pointed out the obvious: that placing all this essential Navy capability on a relatively flat island area, whose access is confined to an aging bridge on one end and a ferry on the other — both vulnerable to earthquake, tsunami and terrorism — is beneath the intelligence of a savvy war planner.

Let me add that there is even more folly, indeed deviancy, to this plan: The U.S. Navy relies on the Growler as its main asset for airborne electronic warfare. Growlers are considered a high-value unit and two fly with every U.S. military mission over enemy territory. Essentially all the electronic warfare-capable planes are home-ported in one geographic location, NAS Whidbey.

Only the Growler fleet, mind you, gets this treatment: all other Navy aircraft functions have at least two bases in the continental U.S. Single siting of any military function is a violation of the Technical Joint Cross Service Group (TJCSG) guidelines. A no-brainer major reason stated in the guidelines: “This will…provide continuity of operations in the event of unexpected disruption.” Hmmm, probably prompted by the Pearl Harbor experience. The Navy scrapped this strategy-101 tactic to continue a convenient use of Whidbey for its Noise of Freedom training despite the numerous burdens to Whidbeyites cited by Anderson and, yes, despite the clear lesson of Pearl Harbor.

To quote a president: “sad.”

Mark Wahl

Langley

More in Letters to the Editor

Letter: Lack of Christian values is the problem, not guns

Editor, We had another shooting and all the anti-gun, anti-Second Amendment people… Continue reading

Letter: Newspaper’s pie poll showed pastry bias

Editor, I could not help but notice in your poll, “What is… Continue reading

Letter: Consequences of gun violence far reaching

Editor, As I sit typing this letter, the news media are reporting… Continue reading

Letter: Carbon fee best option to curb climate change

Editor, A recent letter questioned carbon/divident fee legislation to reduce greenhouse gases,… Continue reading

Letter: Presentation slated to explain tax assessment

Editor, The Island County Assessor’s Office has been invited by the Whidbey… Continue reading

Letter: Monster Mash made more memorable by community

Editor, Whidbey Children’s Theatre (WCT), along with the South Whidbey High School… Continue reading

Letter: Citizens should support house carbon fee bill

Editor, It was the Sunday after the global climate strike inspired by… Continue reading

Letter: Langley ordinance changes encourage affordable housing without sewer

Regarding the Infrastructure Bond proposed for Langley, I am writing to inform… Continue reading

Letter: Congress should ban PFAS in firefighting foam

Editor, Recently I attended an informative meeting hosted by the local greening… Continue reading

Letter: Water infrastructure bond is well thought out

A recent letter to The Record from the head of the “con”… Continue reading

Letter: Water issues need to be addressed in East Langley

Editor, I have been reading the different pros and cons regarding Langley’s… Continue reading

Letter: Willeford is committed to equity in school district

Editor, We are engaged residents of South Whidbey and represent an array… Continue reading