Letter: Navy philosophy dismisses locals’ Growler concerns

Editor,

The Langley resident who dismissed the concerns of people living near the touch-and-go landing strip in Coupeville where the Growlers practice is lacking both facts and historical perspective.

She claims that the landing strip predates many of the locals, and that folks who live there now have no right to complain.

The landing strip was built in the early 1940s, whereas some of today’s farmers on Ebey’s Prairie are descended from those who homesteaded generations ago.

William Henry Sherman arrived in 1896; several of his descendants still live in the area and farm their family’s land. And, if “who got here first” is to be the determinant of whether Ebey’s Reserve should be subjected to constant and deafening noise, shouldn’t the descendants of the Lower Skagit people, who were the prairie’s first farmers, have the final say?

I agree with her that our military should have a safe place to practice maneuvers. Coupeville’s outlying field is not a safe place for Growler field carrier landing practice.

The 5,400-foot runway, built to accommodate aircraft built in the 1940s, is nearly 3,500 feet too short for Growler jet “touch-and-go” operations, which require 8,800 feet. The runway cannot be extended.

For 32 years, the runway has failed to meet Navy runway safety standards. Furthermore, to provide acceptable civilian safeguards and livability, the Navy prefers at least 2,000 of unsettled acres to conduct a training program of this kind.

Yet the Navy conducts training missions over 664 acres of populated land on Whidbey Island.

Thus, the Navy is in violation of its own safety standards, thereby putting civilians, pilots and aircraft, each one costing upwards of $85 million, at risk.

“Please excuse our noise, it’s the sound of freedom” is a Navy slogan that does little to address the legitimate, pressing concerns of islanders about the proposed increase of Growlers over Central Whidbey.

Like most slogans, it’s a simplification that disguises a multitude of wrongs — which is, I suspect, its very purpose.

Dianna MacLeod

Langley

More in Letters to the Editor

Letter: A place on Whidbey to take family

Editor, Spring is fast approaching, and nowhere is it more evident than… Continue reading

Letter: Don’t like the deer in Coupeville? Move to the city

Editor, Regarding the deer in Coupeville article by Kira Erickson in the… Continue reading

Letter: Trump thought he might lose reelection bid

Editor, Why I think former President Trump thought he might lose re-election… Continue reading

Letter: Tantamount to fake wrestling, the kind with bad hair

Editor, This is a response to a letter by Edward Drum, who… Continue reading

Letter: Attacks on AP history teacher unfounded

Editor, We’ve heard from some very opinionated folks on the state of… Continue reading

Letter: UW prof’s idea for tunnel is full of holes

Editor, The UW prof’s idea for a tunnel to replace the Clinton-to-Mukilteo… Continue reading

Letter: Allowed to voice concerns about kids’ education

Editor, As the father of two children, I would like to take… Continue reading

Letter: Vaccinations went quickly, seamlessly

Editor, What a great community we live in. My husband and I… Continue reading

Letter: Don’t censor, but sharing Drum letter unnecessary

Editor, I’d like to take a moment to address the letter from… Continue reading

Most Read