VIEWPOINT: Bad time for U.S. to waver in support of Israel

Lorraine Smalley, a wonderful Goodwill volunteer who is very skillful at fixing up worn-out dolls, has read several books carefully and written out against the U.S. foreign aid policy toward Israel. I find it difficult to respond to Mrs. Smalley’s article because the relationship between the U.S. and Israel is very complicated and I would have to read books and interview many people before I could pass judgment on the financial arrangements between the greatest Democracy and the smallest Democracy on earth.

  • Thursday, June 26, 2008 12:28am
  • Opinion

Lorraine Smalley, a wonderful Goodwill volunteer who is very skillful at fixing up worn-out dolls, has read several books carefully and written out against the U.S. foreign aid policy toward Israel. I find it difficult to respond to Mrs. Smalley’s article because the relationship between the U.S. and Israel is very complicated and I would have to read books and interview many people before I could pass judgment on the financial arrangements between the greatest Democracy and the smallest Democracy on earth.

Is it because Israel is the only true Democracy in the Middle East that the U.S. gives support? Does Israel buy most of its military equipment from U.S. industry and train their people to use them and test them out? Maybe that is beneficial to American safety.

Has Israel’s existence been threatened time and time again by its surrounding neighbors? How has Israel survived surrounded by nations who question its right to exist? Not by weakness but by military might. American support has been vital to the survival of Israel.

And the Palestinian question. I would like to present a more positive scenario.

There are many Israelis who belong to the “Gush Shalom” (peace bloc) movement founded by Uri Avnery. Thousands of Israelis sympathize with the Palestinians. Here are the aims of Gush Shalom: The primary aim is to influence Israeli public opinion and lead it towards peace and conciliation with the Palestinian people based on the following principles:

Putting an end to the occupation.

Accepting the right of the Palestinian people to establish an independent and sovereign State of Palestine in all the territories occupied by Israel in 1967.

Reinstating the pre-1967 “Green line” as the border between the State of Israel and the State of Palestine (with minor exchanges of territories agreed between the parties): the border will be open for the free movement of people and goods, subject to mutual agreement.

Establishing Jerusalem as the capital of the two states, with East Jerusalem (including the Haram al-Sharif) serving as the capital of Palestine and West Jerusalem (including the Western Wall) serving as the capital of Israel. The city to be united on the physical and municipal level, based on mutual agreement.

Recognizing in principle the Right of Return of the Palestinian refugees, allowing each refugee to choose freely between compensation and repatriation to Palestine and Israel, and fixing by mutual agreement the number of refugees who will be able to return to Israel in annual quotas, without undermining the foundations of the State of Israel.

Safeguarding the security of both Israel and Palestine by mutual agreement and guarantees.

Striving for overall peace between Israel and all Arab countries and the creation of a regional union.

The “Gush Shalom” movement is alive and vocal in Israel. Their government is inching towards these goals.

I believe that now is not the time for the U.S. to waver in its support of Israel. A strong Israel, with the support of America, may be able to achieve the peaceful solutions leading to “Shalom.” Let us pray for peace.

Frances Levine Smith lives in Langley and is a past member of the National Board of the Women of Reform Judaism.

More in Opinion

Editorial: To address racism, we must acknwledge that it exists

In her letter to the editor, located below on this page, Coupeville… Continue reading

Opinion: Environmental strategy must focus on more than just climate change

By Don C. Brunell Our environmental quality strategy must be encompassing and… Continue reading

Editorial | Tax credit proposal would aid local journalism

By John Bauer The Herald Bipartisan legislation in the U.S. House would… Continue reading

Editorial: New restrictions unfair to Whidbey restaurants, bars

Whidbey Island’s restaurants, taverns and bars will have to take a step… Continue reading

Editorial: Gordon, Bacon are best candidates for Island County commissioner, as are Johnson, Mischo

In the midst of a global pandemic, we need reliable, compassionate government… Continue reading

Editorial: Fire districts worth the cost, especially when you need them

You get what you pay for. That’s what they say. Voters in… Continue reading

Sound Off: Recalling the Founders’ views of a free press

America’s Founders regarded a free press as so vital to the new… Continue reading

Sound Off: However you rock a face mask, just be sure you wear one

I’ve heard lots of dismal news about the pandemic, the public health… Continue reading

Editorial: No, we don’t need permission to report on meetings

Coupeville Mayor Molly Hughes doesn’t seem to understand a really basic function… Continue reading

Newspaper returns to broadsheet format, moves to new home

No, you aren’t imagining things. Yes, the Whidbey News-Times-South Whidbey Record you’re… Continue reading

Editorial: It’s a difficult conversation, but one we must have

The City of Langley took an important step Monday. The council entered… Continue reading

Sound Off: Addressing white silence on Whidbey Island

I have had the immense privilege of being born and raised on… Continue reading