Enjoyed watching the public process work

Editor,

As the owner, along with my wife Holly, of two storefront businesses in downtown Langley it was gratifying to attend the Planning Advisory Board meeting on Wednesday and see the public process operate the way it is supposed to. City Hall was proposing a zoning change that was not popular with nearby residents nor necessary to accommodate the needs of the property owner.

This proposal was crafted without the input of those most affected by the decision. The residents formed a community group and worked their way into the process, bringing the issue to the Planning Advisory Board. Voices were respectfully listened to and a consensus was reached that satisfied the nearby residents and the property owner. Now it’s up to the council to do the right thing and approve the measure.

This is what should happen with the First Street Redesign in downtown Langley. City Hall determined their course of action behind closed doors. The local business owners were not a part of the process that determined that angled parking should be changed to parallel parking resulting in the loss of at least 12 spaces.

This is parking crucial to the economic vitality of these businesses. This change would allow for no ADA parking on all of First Street. First Street has an historic quality that works.

It is not necessary to tear it apart and build something new. I went door to door asking the business owners what they thought and almost all of them are opposed to this change. More reasonable alternatives exist that address all of the above concerns and improve First Street.

A group of business owners, planning professionals and concerned citizens is organizing to restart the public process to include the opinions of the small business owners of Langley and their customers to create a solution for First Street that works for all users.

To quote the Washington State Open Meetings act: The people of this state do not yield their sovereignty to the agencies which serve them. The people, in delegating authority, do not give their public servants the right to decide what is good for the people to know and what is not good for them to know. The people insist on remaining informed so that they may retain control over the instruments they have created.

David Price

Freeland

More in Letters to the Editor

Letter: Pay bumps for our school leaders are well-deserved

Editor, The purpose of this letter is to provide information to the… Continue reading

Letter: Neighbor dog is not the problem, claims are unfair

Editor, This is in response to Steve Trembley’s letter regarding a dog… Continue reading

Letter: The U.S’s world standing depends on ousting Trump

Editor, Donald J. Trump gives aid and comfort to dictators around the… Continue reading

Letter: There are many benefits to an extra hour of sun

Editor, I read with alarm the plans to go to year-round daylight… Continue reading

Letter: Navy decision is based on ‘fear mongering’

Editor, I read with 100 percent anger and horror about the Navy’s… Continue reading

Letter: WhidbeyHealth shouldn’t be turning away patients

Editor, My wife has been taking allergy shots since November of 2017.… Continue reading

Letter: South Whidbey school administration raises seem questionable

Editor, The South Whidbey Record reported on March 2 the salary increases… Continue reading

Letter: Raise the age to purchase tobacco to 21, save lives

Editor, My father started smoking at age 18, when he joined the… Continue reading

Letter: Thank you to those who hosted safety classes

Editor, I wish to thank the Oak Harbor Senior Center, Island Senior… Continue reading

Most Read