Hannold should ask himself if he’s acting for common good


This letter is in response to the Feb. 15 South Whidbey Record article “County denies grant, labels Coupeville as anti-Navy.”

Mr. Hannold, I, like you, am a retired Navy veteran. I chose to live on Whidbey Island after 26 years of naval service at 12 duty stations, from Hawaii to Italy, and having been deployed all over the world, sometimes 1,000 feet below sea-level and sometimes thousands of feet above.

My kids had to change schools five times. My wife had to deal with bad plumbing and broken cars without me. And yet I’d do it all over again and am proud that my son has embarked on a naval career.

So I was quite offended when you accused me of being “anti-Navy.” I chose to live here because of Whidbey Island’s unique beauty and gracious citizens.

The beauty and character of this island are worth defending, wouldn’t you agree? Choosing to live here does not restrict one’s ability or right to second-guess or question our local, state or federal government. If the government proposes raising our taxes, as citizens, do we not have the right to challenge that proposal?

If the state Department of Transportation proposed turning Highway 20 into “Interstate 20,” would we islanders not be allowed a voice in that decision? But, if the Department of the Navy decides to increase flight operations over our island sixfold, you seem to believe that anyone who questions that decision is “anti-Navy,” and by implication, un-American.

Do you not believe in the First Amendment? Do you find the Articles of the Constitution of the United States inconvenient to your agenda?

Are you sure that you’re representing the concerns of the people of Oak Harbor or are you just the public voice of your own biases?

The U.S. Navy does not own Whidbey Island — the people of Whidbey Island do, the people that you supposedly represent.

So the next time you’re so inclined to disparage an entire community for voicing their opinions concerning the impact a government action might have on the future of their health, their livelihoods, their security, and their property, perhaps you should ask yourself whether you’re doing so for the common good, or just for your own self-serving interests.



More in Letters to the Editor

Guns need as much, if not more, training as cars

Editor, Lorinda Newton’s March 10 letter makes a great argument for the… Continue reading

If guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have them

Editor, Each mass shooting grieves my soul, be it at a school,… Continue reading

Need to start listening to children about guns

Editor, The latest advice from conservative Newt Gingrich: “Let’s arm teachers.” What… Continue reading

Don’t miss out on Uganda’s dancers Friday

Editor, South Whidbey Islanders: Please rejoice and welcome the dozen-plus young people… Continue reading

We’re still blowin’ in the wind

Editor, Over 50 years ago, Bob Dylan recorded “Blowin’ in the Wind,”… Continue reading

I – 1600 volunteer because healthcare is a human right

Editor, Whole Washington is an ambitious group of citizens and health care… Continue reading

Concerned with safety of island and country

Editor, I was concerned about the Feb. 7 article “Law will allow… Continue reading

Roundabout isn’t safe solution to traffic

Editor, The Washington State Department of Transportation has not put traffic counters… Continue reading

Thank you for urging responsible climate change action

Editor, Thank you for your editorial urging responsible action in confronting climate… Continue reading

Irony in Navy, civillian responses to security

Editor, Naval Air Station Whidbey Island just concluded a two-week drill which… Continue reading

Clarifying a few seed-related facts in article

Editor, Thanks so much to The Record for helping spread the word… Continue reading

Good job county for implementing ban

Editor, I want to take a moment to express my appreciation to… Continue reading