Letter: Not anti-defense; against being ‘collateral damage’

Editor,

I read the South Whidbey Record Dec. 5 article, “Navy ends talks on impacts on historic district” and got the distinct impression that this was the move of a “military proconsul” administrator assigned to make sure the population of the region surrounding the military base was “compliant” to any operations of the Navy no matter the damages to the environment and the human beings that live here.

According to the article, the Navy would “provide a total of $450,000 for preservation work, a cultural landscape inventory and a gateway sign.” I assume the sign would be a warning that reads, “the Navy will not be responsible for irreparable damages to any and all humans in this region.”

The Navy terminated these talks, leaving state historical preservation officer Allyson Brooks to comment, “We felt we were still negotiating.”

The sticking point, according to reserve manager Kristen Griffin, “was defining the scale of the impact the change will have on historic properties.

And that comes down to money.”

The preservation interests suggested “$2 million to stabilize concrete structures in Fort Casey and Fort Ebey state parks, $2 million to rehabilitate the Coupeville Wharf and $1.8 million for work preserving the Ferry House.”

Congressman Larsen was disappointed an agreement couldn’t be reached. Yet he suggested something might be worked out.

Gov. Inslee suggested “to mitigate this effect, the U.S. Navy should provide funding to stabilize historic barns and structures as well as soundproof historic homes, helping to preserve the sense of community in this unique setting.”

Are these newly “soundproofed” homes to be opened to humans that still live in this region to work and sleep in when the Growlers “bounce?” That would be absurd, wouldn’t it? Kind of like the Navy offering $450,000 for preservation work. Absurd.

The Navy burns through $16,000 per hour to fly a plane that costs $67 million to buy, yet doesn’t have the funds to build an air station in a remote, uninhabited part of the country to “bounce” these monstrosities?

I am not anti-defense. I am against being collateral damage to military arrogance.

Dan Freeman

Clinton

More in Letters to the Editor

Letter: Thank you, Robert Bishop, county coroner

Editor, I’d like to take a moment to thank our Island County… Continue reading

Letter: Opinion page cartoons are biased against Trump

Editor, I have been a customer of the South Whidbey Record for… Continue reading

Letter: Forget the wall, get Trump to testify while under oath

Editor, When will Donald Trump be forced to testify under oath? Bill… Continue reading

Letter: Forever grateful to Planned Parenthood for what it does

Editor, The coming 46th year anniversary of Roe vs. Wade is certainly… Continue reading

Letter: Choose the life of a child over getting an abortion

Editor, This Jan. 22 marks the 46th anniversary of Roe vs. Wade.… Continue reading

Editorial: Discussing animal shelter policies can be healthy, productive

Stories in the South Whidbey Record about dogs and cats are always… Continue reading

Letter: COER shouldn’t be able to hijack Section 106 process

Editor, Citizens of Ebey’s Reserve, or COER, has hijacked the Section 106… Continue reading

Letter: League of Women Voters, AAUW legislative brunch open to public

Editor, Much has been said about the renewed interest in government in… Continue reading

Letter: Letter writer was spot-on about Growler concerns

Editor, Kudos for Dave Anderson’s strong review of the many arguments for… Continue reading

Most Read