Letter: Not anti-defense; against being ‘collateral damage’

Editor,

I read the South Whidbey Record Dec. 5 article, “Navy ends talks on impacts on historic district” and got the distinct impression that this was the move of a “military proconsul” administrator assigned to make sure the population of the region surrounding the military base was “compliant” to any operations of the Navy no matter the damages to the environment and the human beings that live here.

According to the article, the Navy would “provide a total of $450,000 for preservation work, a cultural landscape inventory and a gateway sign.” I assume the sign would be a warning that reads, “the Navy will not be responsible for irreparable damages to any and all humans in this region.”

The Navy terminated these talks, leaving state historical preservation officer Allyson Brooks to comment, “We felt we were still negotiating.”

The sticking point, according to reserve manager Kristen Griffin, “was defining the scale of the impact the change will have on historic properties.

And that comes down to money.”

The preservation interests suggested “$2 million to stabilize concrete structures in Fort Casey and Fort Ebey state parks, $2 million to rehabilitate the Coupeville Wharf and $1.8 million for work preserving the Ferry House.”

Congressman Larsen was disappointed an agreement couldn’t be reached. Yet he suggested something might be worked out.

Gov. Inslee suggested “to mitigate this effect, the U.S. Navy should provide funding to stabilize historic barns and structures as well as soundproof historic homes, helping to preserve the sense of community in this unique setting.”

Are these newly “soundproofed” homes to be opened to humans that still live in this region to work and sleep in when the Growlers “bounce?” That would be absurd, wouldn’t it? Kind of like the Navy offering $450,000 for preservation work. Absurd.

The Navy burns through $16,000 per hour to fly a plane that costs $67 million to buy, yet doesn’t have the funds to build an air station in a remote, uninhabited part of the country to “bounce” these monstrosities?

I am not anti-defense. I am against being collateral damage to military arrogance.

Dan Freeman

Clinton

More in Letters to the Editor

Letter: WhidbeyHealth is seeking feedback, community voice

Editor, WhidbeyHealth has released an online survey to better understand the community’s… Continue reading

Letter: Medical professionals at hospital informed, kind

Editor, Recently I was admitted to WhidbeyHealth Hospital in Coupeville after a… Continue reading

Letter: Art show was a window into student’s minds

Editor, Goosefoot is to be commended for the effort they put into… Continue reading

Letter: Remember to put ‘Civility First’ this Memorial Day

Editor, On Memorial Day, we pause to remember those who made the… Continue reading

Letter: Ken’s Korner Red Apple improvements welcomed

Editor, A huge applause to the Red Apple in Clinton for being… Continue reading

Letter: The OLF was here long before noise naysayers

Editor, I moved to Whidbey Island about four years ago. Though prices… Continue reading

Letter: Late-night jet noise is resulting in stress, pain

Editor, It’s a quarter to 11 p.m. The planes started flying again… Continue reading

Letter: Why would you complain about Navy jets after move?

Editor, Silence is no longer golden regarding my feelings for the Navy… Continue reading

Suggests JBLM as site for Navy landing practices

Editor, Recently, we requested the Navy consider a viable alternative to using… Continue reading

Most Read