Letter: Carbon fee best option to curb climate change


A recent letter questioned carbon/divident fee legislation to reduce greenhouse gases, stating it’s only going to modestly reduce our earthly temperature in future years. Fortunately, things are not quite that bleak, and here’s why.

It works. A well-documented study tells us that a gradually escalating carbon fee/dividend act could cut carbon dioxide emissions in this country by 33 percent in only 10 years, rising to 52 percent after 20. Such an endeavor doesn’t need to be a bitter pill. It could spur movement to clean energy sources, create jobs and — best of all — return all — yes all — revenue to we citizens, an estimated at $3,456 to a family of four annually by 2025.

Business likes it. The Wall Street Journal stated, “Economists generally argue that carbon taxes are the most efficient and effective way to curb climate change, with the least adverse effects on the economy.”

On the world stage, the 2018 United Nations International Panel on Climate Change, in shooting for a limit on global warming of 1.5 degrees C, tells us that “net carbon dioxide emissions need to drop 45 percent from their 2010 levels by 2030, and reach net-zero by 2050. Remaining carbon dioxide would need to be offset by removing greenhouse gases via reforestation, soil carbon sequestration or technological advancements enabling direct capture of carbon from the atmosphere.”

It’s a start.

Cutting carbon dioxide emissions, now, seems the sensible starting approach, but it’s not the end of the story — there is no single silver bullet, just lots of buckshot. I, for one, would prefer not to be that proverbial frog that perished in a slowly heated kettle of water. I’d opt to jump when the heating was reported and try to turn down the flame

It’s due. After all, 97 percent of our scientific community tells me things are heating up as shown from data on glaciers, sea level rises, ocean temperatures, atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations, etc. Meanwhile, the evening news shows wildfires, flooding and 100-year storms every other year.

Granted, our government has its faults, but if anyone knows something more effective than a carbon fee to reign in carbon dioxide or a better administrator, I’m all ears.

Moving on. Let’s keep this dialogue going. Our climate dilemma will be the subject of a public discussion at WICA, in Langley on Nov. 15. Doors open at 6:30 p.m.

Dean Enell

Member of Citizens Climate Lobby

Whidbey Chapter

More in Letters to the Editor

Letter: Good Cheer is here for all in need, no questions asked

Editor, At times like these, Good Cheer is here for our community.… Continue reading

Letter: Neighbors helping neighbors in the Coupeville way

Editor, Last Monday, our neighbors across the street, Rob and Traci York,… Continue reading

Letter: Hospital management doing all it can

Editor, Hospital management is doing all it can as small systems close… Continue reading

Letter: Price Johnson the kind of leader needed in Olympia

Editor, The first time I saw Helen Price Johnson was at a… Continue reading

Letter: Hospital was impacted but will get through this difficult time

Editor, A recently published letter to Gov. Jay Inslee has caused concern.… Continue reading

Letter: Don’t need the $1,200 check? Maybe share with those who do

Editor, Soon, many of us will receive $1,200 checks from the U.S.… Continue reading

Letter: Grocery store workers should all be commended

Editor, I just returned from grocery shopping at Payless in Freeland. I… Continue reading

Letter: Maybe you feel great, but you can still be contagious

Editor, I’m glad to see more and more people following the 6-foot… Continue reading

Letter: Let store, postal workers know they’re appreciated

Editor, In these strange times where you are urged to self isolate… Continue reading

Most Read