Letter: Reject the water system bond, focus on repairs


The city wants more money for a “Water Management System Improvement Bond” and letters to — and editorials from — this newspaper point to the need to repair our city’s failing infrastructure. This is a red herring. I don’t know of anybody who is opposed to fixing what is broken in the city. Indeed, for decades, my neighborhood in East Langley has complained about the unwillingness of the city to provide the stormwater services we pay for every other month, let alone pave Edgecliff Drive. But rather than secure smaller grants to fix our ailing infrastructure, as it has repeatedly done for the downtown core, the city has opted to sell us a major sewer expansion project packaged up as a “water management system improvement.”

The reason our neighborhood has long opposed sewer expansion is because of the increased burden on the bluff that housing density delivers.

Extending the sewer automatically increases the zoning density in most of our neighborhood and with that increased density comes more impermeable surfaces, fewer trees and bushes and less transpiration, hence more ground water going over and through the bluff.

Over the decades, Edgecliff Drive has experienced severe bluff failures, at several different places. Why does the city risk encouraging more?

It makes no sense to increase housing density in the critical and environmentally-sensitive area of East Langley. We can easily meet our commitments to the GMA without undertaking this sort of spending spree — yet another red herring. In addition, the city is currently entertaining a large, 40 acre, 100-plus housing development on Coles Road, right next to the sewer treatment plant, where development and increased sewer utilization will be paid for by the developer.

In introducing sewers to East Langley, the city threatens to take one of the most affordable housing areas in the city, e.g. along Decker and Furman, and impose a significant economic burden on its homeowners. The increased costs include servicing the bond, hooking our individual houses up to the sewer line. Neighbors, expect $20,000-plus and monthly sewer fees. So long affordable housing.

I urge residents of Langley to vote “No” on the forthcoming bond issue. We need to get our city to focus its attention on fixing what is broken, rather than trying to grow beyond our means. Doing so will keep our bluffs safe, our neighborhoods affordable and our taxes to a minimum.

Jonathon Moses


More in Letters to the Editor

Letter: Citizens should support house carbon fee bill

Editor, It was the Sunday after the global climate strike inspired by… Continue reading

Letter: Monster Mash made more memorable by community

Editor, Whidbey Children’s Theatre (WCT), along with the South Whidbey High School… Continue reading

Letter: Presentation slated to explain tax assessment

Editor, The Island County Assessor’s Office has been invited by the Whidbey… Continue reading

Letter: Willeford is committed to equity in school district

Editor, We are engaged residents of South Whidbey and represent an array… Continue reading

Letter: Langley ordinance changes encourage affordable housing without sewer

Regarding the Infrastructure Bond proposed for Langley, I am writing to inform… Continue reading

Letter: Congress should ban PFAS in firefighting foam

Editor, Recently I attended an informative meeting hosted by the local greening… Continue reading

Letter: Water infrastructure bond is well thought out

A recent letter to The Record from the head of the “con”… Continue reading

Letter: Water issues need to be addressed in East Langley

Editor, I have been reading the different pros and cons regarding Langley’s… Continue reading

Letter: School board needs a new voice

There’s been a lot of talk about experience in this School Board… Continue reading

Letter: Initiative 976 would lead to higher ferry fares

Editor, Tim Eyman is sponsoring another $30 car-tab initiative, I-976, on this… Continue reading

Letter: Status quo on school board needs to be changed

Dear Editor, As a parent and concerned community member, I support Brook… Continue reading

Letter: Supporting fire chief, attracting firefighters are priorities

If you have received a ballot for the upcoming election, you will… Continue reading