Letter: ‘Swing beds’ are wrong way to fix money woes


A June 14 South Whidbey Record article had a leader of “swing beds to help hospital’s financial woes.”

The swing bed scenario of bringing in $400,000 with no increase in staff needs reconsideration. Having been in Everett’s Bethany at Pacific three times after orthopedic surgeries, I have doubts of WhidbeyHealth having suitable staff to provide rehabilitation services. Acute care nurses are not rehabilitation nurses and hospitalist physicians are not rehabilitation practitioners. A reputable program will require the services of practitioner specialties currently not at WhidbeyHealth

Additionally, rehabilitation requires intense physical therapy utilizing equipment and space in the therapy department not in the patient’s room. At WhidbeyHealth this will require the patient to travel through the public lobby/waiting areas to get to and from the Rehabilitation Care Department.

I think that most rehabilitation patients would find this breach of privacy unsuitable. In my opinion, the basic flaw in this swing bed scenario is that according to this news article it was approved by the commissioners “as a new way for the hospital to make money.”

Controller Jennifer Reed points to the financial benefit to the hospital. Nowhere did I hear there is a great patient demand for the service.

The reason that setting aside five beds as swing beds “could mean a cash reimbursement of $400,000 with really no increase in staff” sounds too good to be true because it is.

Wasn’t it just a couple of weeks back that Commission President Wallin asked the community to complete surveys on the hospital and services so that decisions could be made in a transparent manner with community input? Now it seems he is just treating us as cash cows. I want to see WhidbeyHealth succeed financially but this is not the way to do it.

Tom Leahy


More in Letters to the Editor

Letter: Climate crisis doesn’t need to cause a catastrophe

Editor, Let’s jump forward to 2040 and see what’s new with our… Continue reading

Letter: Linda Racicot provides leadership on school board

Editor, I support Linda Racicot for School Board because for over eight… Continue reading

Consider the facts and vote for water infrastructure bond

Editor, I am responding to the letter from Mr. Moses of Edgecliff… Continue reading

Letter: Groundwater management is a much needed component

Editor, The Langley Infrastructure Program handout of May 28 states that the… Continue reading

Letter: Cyr is ‘smart, personable, progressive,’ right for job

Editor, I join the chorus of voices urging citizens to elect Craig… Continue reading

Letter: Don’t buy into ‘myths’ about septic pollution

Editor, In response to Tim Callison’s letter to the editor in the… Continue reading

Letter: Navy naysayers may not like the consequences

Editor, To the misguided citizens trying so very hard to force the… Continue reading

Letter: Moving from California doesn’t mean Californian

Editor, My wife and I recently moved to Whidbey Island from Southern… Continue reading

Letter: In search of rank-and-file supporters with integrity

Editor, I write today to decry all Republicans, and others, who still… Continue reading

Letter: Reject the water system bond, focus on repairs

Editor, The city wants more money for a “Water Management System Improvement… Continue reading

Letter: Langley water system ideas will improve health

Editor, There are many technical and economic aspects of the proposed Langley… Continue reading